IHS Global Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01V (GEOPHYSICS; Gravitational MEASUREMENTS; Detecting Masses OR OBJECTS; Tags).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, IHS ranks #40,853 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #40,853
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 13th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.0/100)
- 17.0
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R40853 · US Corporation #40,853 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #40,853/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ignite Orthopedics
- CPC-NARROW G01V · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ignite Orthopedics LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How IHS’s 24.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around IHS
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- IHS Global · this assignee 24
IHS Global · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows IHS's Innovation Score is 24.0/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for IHS?
Each dot is one of IHS’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). IHS’s own 17.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where IHS's grants concentrate
IHS Global Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under G01V (GEOPHYSICS; Gravitational MEASUREMENTS; Detecting Masses OR OBJECTS; Tags). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, IHS sits between Ignite Orthopedics LLC and Illuminate Consulting, LLC.
Who files at IHS's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ignite Orthopedics
Ignite Orthopedics LLC
6 patents
- IGT UK Interactive
IGT UK Interactive Limited
6 patents
- IHI Ionbond
IHI Ionbond AG.
6 patents
- IHI Southwest
IHI Southwest Technologies
6 patents
- Ikamper
Ikamper Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- IKS
IKS Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Illuma Labs
Illuma Labs Inc.
6 patents
- Illuminate Consul…
Illuminate Consulting, LLC
6 patents
- IHS Global ◀
IHS Global Inc.
6 patents
What this shows IHS holds 6 patents at rank #40,829, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near IHS
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,829 in granted patent volume.
- Ignite Orthopedics LLC #40,825 · 6 patents
- IGT UK Interactive Limited #40,826 · 6 patents
- IHI Ionbond AG. #40,827 · 6 patents
- IHI Southwest Technologies #40,828 · 6 patents
- Ikamper Co., Ltd. #40,830 · 6 patents
- IKS Co., Ltd. #40,831 · 6 patents
- Illuma Labs Inc. #40,832 · 6 patents
- Illuminate Consulting, LLC #40,833 · 6 patents
Leaders in G01V (Geophysics)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in IHS's primary technology class.
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 1,636 in class
- Schlumberger Technology Corporation 1,274 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 780 in class
- PGS Geophysical AS 415 in class
- CGG Services SAS 298 in class
- Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company 252 in class
- Landmark Graphics Corporation 222 in class
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 216 in class
IHS's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does IHS Global Inc. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
IHS Global Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- IHS Global Inc.'s lead technology class is G01V (GEOPHYSICS; Gravitational MEASUREMENTS; Detecting Masses OR OBJECTS; Tags), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01V
- Ranked #40,853 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare IHS Global Inc. against Ignite Orthopedics LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.