Where does iBio, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), iBio, Inc. ranks #21,249 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does iBio, Inc. hold?

iBio, Inc. holds 13 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is iBio, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

iBio, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 50.3 out of 100 (top 13% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does iBio, Inc. focus on?

iBio, Inc.'s top technology area is C07K (Peptides) with 13 patents, ranking #709 of 3,615 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

Is iBio, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

iBio, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for iBio, Inc.'s patents?

iBio, Inc.'s patents average 16.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the iBio, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

iBio, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C07K (Peptides).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, ibio ranks #21,249 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 10 technology areas.

#21,249
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.3/100): 16.7
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R21249 · US Corporation #21,249 · 13 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
MID-PACK #21,249/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH argenx Bvba
CPC-FOCUS C07K · 10 areas
INNOV-PAR 50.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: argenx Bvba (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How ibio’s 50.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.1 pts (18%) Velocity 20.0 pts (40%) Breadth 11.2 pts (22%) Claim depth 10.0 pts (20%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
iBio · this assignee

50
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows ibio's Innovation Score is 50.3/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for ibio?

Each dot is one of ibio’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). ibio’s own 16.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

ibio vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where ibio's grants concentrate

iBio, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C07K (Peptides). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, ibio sits between Zoeller Pump Company, LLC and 1E Limited.

ibio's three-year grant acceleration

iBio, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Zoeller Pump

13
argenx Bvba

13
artience

13
eresearchtechnolo…

13
uavionix

13
ibio ◀

13
0chain

12
1934612 Ontario

12
1E

12

What this shows iBio holds 13 patents at rank #22,090, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near iBio

By rank, the assignees closest to #22,090 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C07K (Peptides)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in iBio's primary technology class.

ibio's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

iBio, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	5	38.5%
2017	3	23.1%
2020	1	7.7%
2023	2	15.4%
2024	1	7.7%
2025partial year	1	7.7%

Which technologies does iBio, Inc. patent most?

C07K - Peptides 13

A61P - Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations 8

C12N - Microorganisms OR ENZYMES; Compositions THEREOF; Propagating, Preserving, OR Maintaining MICROORGANISMS; Mutation OR Genetic ENGINEERING; Culture Media 8

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 7

C12P - Fermentation OR Enzyme-using Processes TO Synthesise A Desired Chemical Compound OR Composition OR TO Separate Optical Isomers From A Racemic Mixture 3

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 2

G16B - Bioinformatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Genetic OR Protein-related Data Processing IN Computational Molecular Biology 1

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 1

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 1

C12Y - Enzymes 1

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

iBio, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

iBio, Inc.'s lead technology class is C07K (Peptides), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C07K
Ranked #21,249 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare iBio, Inc. against Zoeller Pump Company, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 50.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.