Where does Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. ranks #5,678 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. hold?

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. holds 60 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 32.6 out of 100 (42nd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -53% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.'s patents?

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.'s patents average 14.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. focus on?

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.'s top technology area is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment) with 51 patents, ranking #25 of 1,021 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 60 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Hoist ranks #5,678 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 60 patents across 5 technology areas.

#5,678
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 42nd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.6/100): 14.9
avg claims per patent: -53%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5678 · US Corporation #5,678 · 60 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 60 grants
UPPER-Q #5,678/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Great Lakes…
CPC-NARROW A63B · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 14.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -53% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Hoist’s 32.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.2 pts (44%) Velocity 1.5 pts (5%) Breadth 7.9 pts (24%) Claim depth 9.0 pts (28%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Carson Optical · near

33
Féinics AmaTech… · near

33
AiBUY · near

33
Hoist Fitness Systems · this assignee

33
Toshiba Samsung… · near

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Hoist's Innovation Score is 32.6/100 (42nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Hoist?

Each dot is one of Hoist’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Hoist’s own 14.9 claims/patent is at or below the 15.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Hoist vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Hoist's grants concentrate

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 85% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (14 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Hoist sits between Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. and I-sens, Inc..

Hoist's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. moved from 22 to 5 grants (0.23x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Great Lakes Neuro…

60
Hankook Tire & Te…

60
HBI Branded Appar…

60
Heliae Development

60
Hyperloop

60
Hangzhou H3C

60
Hyperfine Operati…

60
I-sens

60
Hoist Fitness Sys… ◀

60

What this shows Hoist holds 60 patents at rank #5,676, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Hoist

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,676 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Hoist's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Hoist, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training), Hoist ranks #25 of 1,021 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (33 here).

AiBUY, Inc. 33 Féinics AmaTech Teoranta 33 Carson Optical, Inc. 33 Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation 33

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (14.9 here).

Musc Foundation for Research Development 14.9 avg Kodak Alaris, LLC 14.9 avg MCP IP, LLC 14.9 avg China Academy OF Telecommunications Technology 14.9 avg

Hoist's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	5	8.3%
2016	4	6.7%
2017	6	10.0%
2018	14	23.3%
2019	9	15.0%
2020	7	11.7%
2021	6	10.0%
2022	1	1.7%
2023	2	3.3%
2024	2	3.3%
2025partial year	4	6.7%

Which technologies does Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. patent most?

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 51

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 6

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 3

Y10S - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests 1

A47B - TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 85% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
Ranked #5,678 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. against Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.