Where does Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. ranks #5,672 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. hold?

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. holds 60 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 13 technology areas.

What is Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. has an Innovation Score of 43.7 out of 100 (top 27% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. focus on?

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.'s top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification) with 51 patents, ranking #370 of 7,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 13 CPC subclasses total.

Is Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +29% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.'s patents?

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.'s patents average 18.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 60 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Great ranks #5,672 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 60 patents across 13 technology areas.

#5,672
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 27%
by Innovation Score (43.7/100): 18.7
avg claims per patent: +29%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5672 · US Corporation #5,672 · 60 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 60 grants
UPPER-Q #5,672/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Everlast Climbing…
CPC-FOCUS A61B · 13 areas
INNOV-PAR 43.7/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-UP +29% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Everlast Climbing Industries, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Great’s 43.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.2 pts (32%) Velocity 5.6 pts (13%) Breadth 12.7 pts (29%) Claim depth 11.2 pts (26%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Beijing Vcore… · near

44
DEB IP · near

44
Great Lakes… · this assignee

44
M E P Macchine… · near

44
Shinmaywa Industries · near

44
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Great's Innovation Score is 43.7/100 (top 27% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Great?

Each dot is one of Great’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Great’s own 18.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Great vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Great's grants concentrate

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 85% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (10 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2015. By volume, Great sits between Everlast Climbing Industries, Inc. and Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc..

Great's three-year grant acceleration

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. shows 15 grants in 2022–2024 against only 18 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Everlast Climbing…

60
F S Korea Industr…

60
Guangdong Midea K…

60
Generac Power Sys…

60
Hankook Tire & Te…

60
HBI Branded Appar…

60
Heliae Development

60
Hoist Fitness Sys…

60
Great Lakes Neuro… ◀

60

What this shows Great holds 60 patents at rank #5,672, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Great

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,672 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Great's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Great, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61B (Diagnosis), Great ranks #370 of 7,127 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (44 here).

M.E.P. Macchine Elettroniche Piegatrici S. P.A. 44 DEB IP Limited 44 Shinmaywa Industries, Ltd. 44 Beijing Vcore Technology Co., Ltd. 44

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (18.7 here).

Eyelock LLC 18.7 avg Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. 18.7 avg Lattice Semiconductor Corporation 18.7 avg American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. 18.7 avg

Great's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

44 Top 27% higher than 73% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	3.3%
2016	9	15.0%
2017	4	6.7%
2018	7	11.7%
2019	2	3.3%
2020	6	10.0%
2021	10	16.7%
2022	4	6.7%
2023	6	10.0%
2024	5	8.3%
2025partial year	5	8.3%

Which technologies does Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. patent most?

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 51

A61N - ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy 45

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 37

A61M - Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor 20

G16Z - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Specific Application Fields, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 2

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 2

A43D - Machines, Tools, Equipment OR Methods FOR Manufacturing OR Repairing Footwear 2

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 2

A43B - Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear 2

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 2

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 1

Y10S - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests 1

Top 13 of 13 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 85% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
Ranked #5,672 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies Inc. against Everlast Climbing Industries, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 43.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.