Where does Green Extraction Technologies rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Green Extraction Technologies ranks #47,176 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Green Extraction Technologies hold?

Green Extraction Technologies holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2021, spanning 13 technology areas.

What is Green Extraction Technologies's Innovation Score?

Green Extraction Technologies has an Innovation Score of 28.1 out of 100 (26th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Green Extraction Technologies focus on?

Green Extraction Technologies's top technology area is C08B (POLYSACCHARIDES; Derivatives Thereof) with 4 patents, ranking #101 of 415 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 13 CPC subclasses total.

Is Green Extraction Technologies's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Green Extraction Technologies's recent grant velocity is -33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Green Extraction Technologies's patents?

Green Extraction Technologies's patents average 15.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Green Extraction Technologies patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Green Extraction Technologies

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C08B (POLYSACCHARIDES; Derivatives Thereof).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Green ranks #47,176 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 13 technology areas.

#47,176
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 26th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.1/100): 15.2
avg claims per patent: -33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R47176 · US Corporation #47,176 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #47,176/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Granite Tactical…
CPC-FOCUS C08B · 13 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.2 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Granite Tactical Vehicles Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Green’s 28.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (22%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 12.7 pts (45%) Claim depth 9.1 pts (33%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Green Extraction · this assignee

28
Nextronics Engineering · near

28
Lisle · near

28
Mitralign · near

28
Nsk-warner K K · near

28
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Green's Innovation Score is 28.1/100 (26th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Green?

Each dot is one of Green’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Green’s own 15.2 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Green vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Green's grants concentrate

Green Extraction Technologies is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under C08B (POLYSACCHARIDES; Derivatives Thereof). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Green sits between Granite Tactical Vehicles Inc. and GreenFire Energy Inc..

Granite Tactical…

5
Graypants Europe…

5
Grazper Aps

5
Great Eastern Res…

5
Green Materials

5
Green Powerset

5
Green Vision Syst…

5
Greenfire Energy

5
Green Extraction ◀

5

What this shows Green holds 5 patents at rank #47,233, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Green

By rank, the assignees closest to #47,233 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C08B (Polysaccharides)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Green's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Green, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C08B (Polysaccharides), Green ranks #101 of 415 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (28 here).

Nextronics Engineering Corp. 28 Mitralign, Inc. 28 Nsk-warner K.K. 28 Lisle Corporation 28

Green's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 26th percentile higher than 26% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Green Extraction Technologies patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	20.0%
2017	1	20.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2021	2	40.0%

Which technologies does Green Extraction Technologies patent most?

C08B - POLYSACCHARIDES; Derivatives Thereof 4

B01D - Separation 4

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 3

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 3

C07G - Compounds OF Unknown Constitution 3

D21B - Fibrous RAW Materials OR Their Mechanical Treatment 3

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 1

D21H - Pulp COMPOSITIONS; Preparation Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclasses D21c OR D21D; Impregnating OR Coating OF PAPER; Treatment OF Finished Paper NOT Covered BY Class B31 OR Subclass D21G; Paper NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 1

C08H - Derivatives OF Natural Macromolecular Compounds 1

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 1

H01R - Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors 1

D21C - Production OF Cellulose BY Removing Non-cellulose Substances From Cellulose-containing MATERIALS; Regeneration OF Pulping LIQUORS; Apparatus Therefor 1

Top 13 of 13 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Green Extraction Technologies's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Green Extraction Technologies's lead technology class is C08B (POLYSACCHARIDES; Derivatives Thereof), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C08B
Ranked #47,176 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Green Extraction Technologies against Granite Tactical Vehicles Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.