Overall rank by patents
#874
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 517 granted patents across 160 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B60R (VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR).
The verdict
Daicel holds 517 US patents across 160 technology areas, rank #874 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Daicel Corporation has been granted 517 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Daicel Corporation at rank #874 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 160 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in B60R (VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR). As a Foreign Corporation, Daicel Corporation is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Daicel sits between Micromass UK Limited (519 patents, rank #870) and DISH Network L.l.c. (516 patents, rank #878) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 59.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 343 grants, compared with 174 in the 2015–2019 window, a +97% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Daicel Corporation's 11.8 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while a diversified footprint across 100+ CPC subclasses spreads risk across many technology fronts. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Daicel Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Micromass UK Limited
519 patents
OPEN TEXT SA ULC
518 patents
PepsiCo, Inc.
518 patents
Tesla, Inc.
518 patents
Graco Minnesota Inc.
517 patents
The Florida International University Board of Trustees
517 patents
XI'AN ZHONGXING NEW SOFTWARE CO., LTD.
517 patents
DAICEL CORPORATION
517 patents
DISH Network L.L.C.
516 patents
What this shows Daicel holds 517 patents at rank #874, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #874 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Daicel's primary technology class.
Daicel's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
59 Top 4% higher than 96% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 23 | 4.4% |
| 2016 | 28 | 5.4% |
| 2017 | 28 | 5.4% |
| 2018 | 38 | 7.4% |
| 2019 | 57 | 11.0% |
| 2020 | 67 | 13.0% |
| 2021 | 70 | 13.5% |
| 2022 | 38 | 7.4% |
| 2023 | 45 | 8.7% |
| 2024 | 75 | 14.5% |
| 2025 | 48 | 9.3% |
Top 15 of 160 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#874
Across all tracked assignees
59.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Daicel's 517 grants land it in the top 4% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.