Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare (UK) IP Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 22 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A46B (Brushes).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Glaxosmithkline ranks #13,446 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 22 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #13,446
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 45th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.5/100)
- 8.6
- avg claims per patent
- +167%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13446 · Foreign Corporation #13,446 · 22 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 22 grants
- MID-PACK #13,446/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Galera Labs
- CPC-FOCUS A46B · 14 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.5/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +167% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Galera Labs, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Glaxosmithkline’s 33.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Glaxosmithkline
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Glaxosmithkline… · this assignee 33
Glaxosmithkline… · this assignee
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Glaxosmithkline's Innovation Score is 33.5/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Glaxosmithkline?
Each dot is one of Glaxosmithkline’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Glaxosmithkline’s own 8.6 claims/patent is at or below the 15.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Glaxosmithkline's grants concentrate
Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare (UK) IP Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 36.4% of grants classified under A46B (Brushes). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Glaxosmithkline sits between Gapwaves AB and General Fusion Inc..
Glaxosmithkline's three-year grant acceleration
Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare (UK) IP Limited shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 11 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Glaxosmithkline's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Gapwaves AB
Gapwaves AB
22 patents
- GCI Outdoor
GCI Outdoor LLC
22 patents
- Gessi S P A
Gessi S.P.A.
22 patents
- GIL Medical Center
GIL Medical Center
22 patents
- GPB Scientific
GPB Scientific, LLC
22 patents
- Gpsip
GPSip, Inc.
22 patents
- Galera Labs
Galera Labs, LLC
22 patents
- General Fusion
General Fusion Inc.
22 patents
- Glaxosmithkline C… ◀
Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare (UK) IP Limited
22 patents
What this shows Glaxosmithkline holds 22 patents at rank #13,439, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Glaxosmithkline
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,439 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in A46B (Brushes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Glaxosmithkline's primary technology class.
Glaxosmithkline's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 9.1% |
| 2018 | 2 | 9.1% |
| 2019 | 2 | 9.1% |
| 2020 | 2 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 7 | 31.8% |
| 2022 | 2 | 9.1% |
| 2023 | 4 | 18.2% |
| 2024 | 1 | 4.5% |
Which technologies does Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare (UK) IP Limited patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare (UK) IP Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare (UK) IP Limited's lead technology class is A46B (Brushes), 36.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A46B
- Ranked #13,446 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare (UK) IP Limited against Gapwaves AB, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.