Geek Wraps, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Geek ranks #35,457 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #35,457
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 45%
- by Innovation Score (36.8/100)
- 16.1
- avg claims per patent
- -60%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35457 · US Corporation #35,457 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,457/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Gato Assets
- CPC-FOCUS Y10T · 14 areas
- INNOV-THIN 36.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -60% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Gato Assets, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Geek’s 36.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Geek
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Geek Wraps · this assignee
Geek Wraps · this assignee
37 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Geek's Innovation Score is 36.8/100 (top 45% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Geek?
Each dot is one of Geek’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Geek’s own 16.1 claims/patent is at or below the 16.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Geek's grants concentrate
Geek Wraps, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 28.6% of grants classified under Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Geek sits between Gato Assets, LLC and Gemalto AG.
Geek's three-year grant acceleration
Geek Wraps, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Geek's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Gato Assets
Gato Assets, LLC
7 patents
- Gazelle Semicondu…
Gazelle Semiconductor, Inc.
7 patents
- Gear Head Works
Gear Head Works, LLC
7 patents
- Gebrüder Busatis…
Gebrüder Busatis Gesellschaft m.b.H.
7 patents
- Geenee
Geenee GmbH
7 patents
- Geissler Companies
Geissler Companies, LLC
7 patents
- Gelion Pty
Gelion Technologies Pty Ltd
7 patents
- Gemalto
Gemalto AG
7 patents
- Geek Wraps ◀
Geek Wraps, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Geek holds 7 patents at rank #35,517, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Geek
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,517 in granted patent volume.
- Gato Assets, LLC #35,513 · 7 patents
- Gazelle Semiconductor, Inc. #35,514 · 7 patents
- Gear Head Works, LLC #35,515 · 7 patents
- Gebrüder Busatis Gesellschaft m.b.H. #35,516 · 7 patents
- Geenee GmbH #35,518 · 7 patents
- Geissler Companies, LLC #35,519 · 7 patents
- Gelion Technologies Pty Ltd #35,520 · 7 patents
- Gemalto AG #35,521 · 7 patents
Leaders in Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Geek's primary technology class.
Geek's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 45% higher than 55% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Geek Wraps, Inc. patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Geek Wraps, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Geek Wraps, Inc.'s lead technology class is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification), 28.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y10T
- Ranked #35,457 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Geek Wraps, Inc. against Gato Assets, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 36.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.