Where does Floricultura rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Floricultura ranks #3,772 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Floricultura hold?

Floricultura holds 96 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2019, spanning 0 technology areas.

What is Floricultura's Innovation Score?

Floricultura has an Innovation Score of 16.4 out of 100 (4th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Floricultura focus on?

Floricultura holds grants across 0 technology areas classified under the Cooperative Patent Classification system.

Is Floricultura's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Floricultura's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Floricultura's patents?

Floricultura's patents average 1.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Floricultura patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Floricultura

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 96 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Floricultura ranks #3,772 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 96 patents across 0 technology areas.

#3,772
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 4th percentile
by Innovation Score (16.4/100): 1.0
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3772 · Foreign Corporation #3,772 · 96 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 96 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,772/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Crosman
CPC-UNK CPC blank
INNOV-LOW 16.4/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Crosman Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Floricultura’s 16.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 15.8 pts (96%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 0.0 pts (0%) Claim depth 0.6 pts (4%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
C7th · near

17
Idea Nuova · near

16
BSN Sports · near

16
Etherwhere · near

16
Floricultura · this assignee

16
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Floricultura's Innovation Score is 16.4/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Floricultura?

Each dot is one of Floricultura’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Floricultura’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Floricultura vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Floricultura's grants concentrate

Floricultura is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2015 (39 grants) versus a trough of 6 in 2017. By volume, Floricultura sits between Crosman Corporation and J. Morita MFG. Corp..

Crosman

96
Dover Europe Sàrl

96
Erico Internation…

96
Federal Express

96
Hanmi Pharm

96
Hellermanntyton

96
Hallmark Cards In…

96
J Morita MFG

96
Floricultura ◀

96

What this shows Floricultura holds 96 patents at rank #3,772, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Floricultura

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,772 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Floricultura, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (16 here).

Etherwhere Corporation 16 BSN Sports, LLC 16 Idea Nuova, Inc. 16 C7th Limited 17

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (1.0 here).

Kuen Hwa Traffic Industrial Co., Ltd. 1.0 avg Bulgari S.P.A. 1.0 avg Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha 1.0 avg Elsner Pac Jungpflanzen GbR 1.0 avg

Floricultura's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

16 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Floricultura patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	39	40.6%
2016	24	25.0%
2017	6	6.3%
2018	12	12.5%
2019	15	15.6%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Floricultura's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Ranked #3,772 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Floricultura against Crosman Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 16.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.