Where does Crosman Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Crosman Corporation ranks #3,768 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Crosman Corporation hold?

Crosman Corporation holds 96 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 18 technology areas.

What is Crosman Corporation's Innovation Score?

Crosman Corporation has an Innovation Score of 46.3 out of 100 (top 21% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Crosman Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Crosman Corporation's recent grant velocity is +140% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Crosman Corporation's patents?

Crosman Corporation's patents average 12.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Crosman Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Crosman Corporation

Q: What technology areas does Crosman Corporation focus on?

Crosman Corporation's top technology area is F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 48 patents, ranking #3 of 154 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 18 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 96 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Crosman ranks #3,768 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 96 patents across 18 technology areas.

#3,768
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 21%
by Innovation Score (46.3/100): 12.9
avg claims per patent: +140%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3768 · US Corporation #3,768 · 96 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 96 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,768/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Behr Process
CPC-FOCUS F41B · 18 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +140% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Behr Process Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Crosman’s 46.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 15.8 pts (34%) Velocity 7.7 pts (17%) Breadth 15.0 pts (32%) Claim depth 7.8 pts (17%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Chunghwa Picture Tubes · near

46
Crosman · this assignee

46
Helmholtz Zentrum… · near

46
RB Distribution · near

46
Ubiquiti · near

46
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Crosman's Innovation Score is 46.3/100 (top 21% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Crosman?

Each dot is one of Crosman’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Crosman’s own 12.9 claims/patent is at or below the 16.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Crosman vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Crosman's grants concentrate

Crosman Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 18 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (14 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Crosman sits between Behr Process Corporation and Floricultura.

Crosman's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Crosman Corporation moved from 31 to 36 grants (1.16x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Behr Process

96
Cognizant Technol…

96
Conversant Wirele…

96
Covestro Intellec…

96
Dover Europe Sàrl

96
Erico Internation…

96
Federal Express

96
Floricultura

96
Crosman ◀

96

What this shows Crosman holds 96 patents at rank #3,768, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Crosman

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,768 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Crosman's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Crosman, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive…), Crosman ranks #3 of 154 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (46 here).

RB Distribution, Inc. 46 Helmholtz Zentrum München Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH) 46 Ubiquiti Inc. 46 Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. 46

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (12.9 here).

Johnson Health Tech Co., Ltd. 12.9 avg HCL Technologies Limited 12.9 avg Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. KG 12.9 avg LG Chem, Ltd. 12.9 avg

Crosman's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

46 Top 21% higher than 79% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Crosman Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	1.0%
2016	1	1.0%
2017	6	6.3%
2018	10	10.4%
2019	7	7.3%
2020	12	12.5%
2021	12	12.5%
2022	9	9.4%
2023	13	13.5%
2024	14	14.6%
2025partial year	11	11.5%

Which technologies does Crosman Corporation patent most?

F41B - Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 48

F41G - Weapon SIGHTS; Aiming 31

F41A - Functional Features OR Details Common TO Both Smallarms AND Ordnance, e.g. CANNONS; Mountings FOR Smallarms OR Ordnance 24

F41C - Smallarms, e.g. Pistols, Rifles ; Accessories Therefor 13

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 10

F21V - Functional Features OR Details OF Lighting Devices OR Systems THEREOF; Structural Combinations OF Lighting Devices With Other Articles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 9

F41H - ARMOUR; Armoured TURRETS; Armoured OR Armed VEHICLES; Means OF Attack OR Defence, e.g. Camouflage, IN General 4

H05B - Electric HEATING; Electric Light Sources NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Circuit Arrangements FOR Electric Light Sources, IN General 3

G01R - Measuring Electric VARIABLES; Measuring Magnetic Variables 3

F42B - Explosive Charges, e.g. FOR Blasting, Fireworks, Ammunition 3

A01K - Animal HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; Rearing OR Breeding Animals, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; NEW Breeds OF Animals 3

F21W - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO Uses OR Applications OF Lighting Devices OR Systems 3

F21L - Lighting Devices OR Systems Thereof, Being Portable OR Specially Adapted FOR Transportation 3

G01B - Measuring Length, Thickness OR Similar Linear DIMENSIONS; Measuring ANGLES; Measuring AREAS; Measuring Irregularities OF Surfaces OR Contours 3

G02B - Optical Elements, Systems OR Apparatus 2

Top 15 of 18 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Crosman Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Crosman Corporation's lead technology class is F41B (Weapons FOR Projecting Missiles Without USE OF Explosive OR Combustible Propellant CHARGE; Weapons NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F41B
Ranked #3,768 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Crosman Corporation against Behr Process Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.