Where does Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha ranks #3,651 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha hold?

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha holds 100 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 0 technology areas.

What is Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha's Innovation Score?

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha has an Innovation Score of 21.8 out of 100 (9th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha focus on?

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha holds grants across 0 technology areas classified under the Cooperative Patent Classification system.

Is Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha's recent grant velocity is +17% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha's patents?

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha's patents average 1.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 100 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Casio ranks #3,651 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 100 patents across 0 technology areas.

#3,651
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 9th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.8/100): 1.0
avg claims per patent: +17%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R3651 · Foreign Corporation #3,651 · 100 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MID 100 grants
TOP-DECILE #3,651/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH ABB S P A
CPC-UNK CPC blank
INNOV-THIN 21.8/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-UP +17% vel
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: ABB S.P.A. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Casio’s 21.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 15.9 pts (73%) Velocity 5.3 pts (24%) Breadth 0.0 pts (0%) Claim depth 0.6 pts (3%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Echostreams… · near

22
Casio Keisanki · this assignee

22
ViskoTeepak Belgium · near

22
cortical io · near

22
Nitta Haas · near

22
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Casio's Innovation Score is 21.8/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Casio?

Each dot is one of Casio’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Casio’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 13.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Casio vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Casio's grants concentrate

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2015 (18 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2023. By volume, Casio sits between ABB S.P.A. and GE Healthcare Limited.

Casio's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha moved from 29 to 23 grants (0.79x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #1,863. See the growth leaderboard.

ABB S P A

100
Arnold & Richter…

100
Arconic

100
Biomet 3i

100
Chargepoint

100
FCA Italy S p A

100
Forescout

100
GE Healthcare

100
Casio Keisanki ◀

100

What this shows Casio holds 100 patents at rank #3,651, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Casio

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,651 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Casio, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (22 here).

ViskoTeepak Belgium NV 22 cortical.io AG 22 Nitta Haas Inc. 22 Echostreams Innovative Solutions, LLC 22

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (1.0 here).

Bulgari S.P.A. 1.0 avg Floricultura 1.0 avg Kuen Hwa Traffic Industrial Co., Ltd. 1.0 avg Wah Hung Group Inc 1.0 avg

Casio's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	18	18.0%
2016	4	4.0%
2017	4	4.0%
2018	11	11.0%
2019	4	4.0%
2020	12	12.0%
2021	13	13.0%
2022	6	6.0%
2023	3	3.0%
2024	14	14.0%
2025partial year	11	11.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Ranked #3,651 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha against ABB S.P.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 21.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.