Where does Fina Technology, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Fina Technology, Inc. ranks #2,435 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Fina Technology, Inc. hold?

Fina Technology, Inc. holds 160 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 53 technology areas.

What is Fina Technology, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Fina Technology, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 54.8 out of 100 (top 7% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Fina Technology, Inc. focus on?

Fina Technology, Inc.'s top technology area is C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds) with 74 patents, ranking #66 of 2,352 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 53 CPC subclasses total.

Is Fina Technology, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Fina Technology, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -63% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Fina Technology, Inc.'s patents?

Fina Technology, Inc.'s patents average 16.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Fina Technology, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Fina Technology, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 160 granted patents across 53 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Fina ranks #2,435 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 160 patents across 53 technology areas.

#2,435
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 7%
by Innovation Score (54.8/100): 16.1
avg claims per patent: -63%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2435 · US Corporation #2,435 · 160 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MID 160 grants
TOP-DECILE #2,435/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH AMI Industries
CPC-WIDE C08L · 53 areas
INNOV-PAR 54.8/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -63% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: AMI Industries, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Fina’s 54.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 17.6 pts (32%) Velocity 2.5 pts (5%) Breadth 25.0 pts (46%) Claim depth 9.7 pts (18%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Fina Technology · this assignee

55
Nagase ChemteX · near

55
Heraeus Medical · near

55
Konica Minolta… · near

55
Snecma · near

55
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Fina's Innovation Score is 54.8/100 (top 7% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Fina?

Each dot is one of Fina’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Fina’s own 16.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Fina vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How Fina's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, Fina Technology, Inc. received 43 grants versus 116 in 2015–2019 (-63% equal-window velocity, below median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2015 at 32 grants and bottomed in 2024 at 3. Lead class C08L accounts for 46.3% of the portfolio across 53 subclasses. Volume neighbours: AMI Industries, Inc. (#2,431) and Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd. (#2,439).

Fina's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Fina Technology, Inc. moved from 45 to 17 grants (0.38x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #2,909. See the growth leaderboard.

AMI Industries

160
Bigfoot Biomedical

160
Carvana

160
Feitian

160
Fronius Internati…

160
GE Global Sourcing

160
Globe (Jiangsu)

160
Hitachi Koki

160
Fina Technology ◀

160

What this shows Fina holds 160 patents at rank #2,435, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Fina

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,435 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Fina's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Fina, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds), Fina ranks #66 of 2,352 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (55 here).

Nagase ChemteX Corporation 55 Heraeus Medical GmbH 55 Konica Minolta Laboratory U.S.A., Inc. 55 Snecma 55

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (16.1 here).

Shanghai Avic Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. 16.1 avg Trinity Bay Equipment Holdings, LLC 16.1 avg Philip Morris USA Inc. 16.1 avg Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation 16.1 avg

Fina's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

55 Top 7% higher than 93% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Fina Technology, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	32	20.0%
2016	26	16.3%
2017	21	13.1%
2018	18	11.3%
2019	19	11.9%
2020	17	10.6%
2021	9	5.6%
2022	7	4.4%
2023	7	4.4%
2024	3	1.9%
2025partial year	1	0.6%

Which technologies does Fina Technology, Inc. patent most?

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 74

C08F - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds 73

C08J - WORKING-UP; General Processes OF COMPOUNDING; After-treatment NOT Covered BY Subclasses C08b, C08c, C08f, C08g or C08h 41

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 39

C07C - Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds 33

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 33

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 27

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 25

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 20

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 16

C09J - ADHESIVES; Non-mechanical Aspects OF Adhesive Processes IN GENERAL; Adhesive Processes NOT Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF Materials AS Adhesives 15

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 14

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 13

C08C - Treatment OR Chemical Modification OF Rubbers 12

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 11

Top 15 of 53 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Fina Technology, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Fina Technology, Inc.'s lead technology class is C08L (Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds), 46.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C08L
Ranked #2,435 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Fina Technology, Inc. against AMI Industries, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 54.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.