Overall rank by patents
#35,257
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2016–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B29C (SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING).
The verdict
Extrude holds 7 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #35,257 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Extrude To Fill, Inc. has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2016 and 2024, placing Extrude To Fill, Inc. at rank #35,257 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 26.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in B29C (SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING). As a US Corporation, Extrude To Fill, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Extrude sits between Exomens (7 patents, rank #35,253) and F TIME Technology Industrial Co., Ltd. (7 patents, rank #35,261) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 43.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a -60% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Extrude To Fill, Inc.'s 26.7 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Extrude To Fill, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Exomens
7 patents
Expose Retail Strategies, Inc.
7 patents
ExteNet Systems, Inc.
7 patents
Extract Management Company, LLC
7 patents
Extundo Incorporated
7 patents
Eye Lighting International of North America, Inc.
7 patents
F Robotics Acquisitions Ltd.
7 patents
F TIME TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
7 patents
Extrude to Fill, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows Extrude holds 7 patents at rank #35,257, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,257 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Extrude's primary technology class.
Extrude's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
43 Top 28% higher than 72% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#35,257
Across all tracked assignees
43.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Extrude's 7 grants land it in the top 28% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.