Where does Extract Management Company, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Extract Management Company, LLC ranks #35,263 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Extract Management Company, LLC hold?

Extract Management Company, LLC holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2023, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is Extract Management Company, LLC's Innovation Score?

Extract Management Company, LLC has an Innovation Score of 46.6 out of 100 (top 20% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Extract Management Company, LLC focus on?

Extract Management Company, LLC's top technology area is F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps) with 6 patents, ranking #252 of 1,034 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is Extract Management Company, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Extract Management Company, LLC.

What does claim depth mean for Extract Management Company, LLC's patents?

Extract Management Company, LLC's patents average 18.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Extract Management Company, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Extract Management Company, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Extract ranks #35,263 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 11 technology areas.

#35,263
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 20%
by Innovation Score (46.6/100): 18.4
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R35263 · US Corporation #35,263 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #35,263/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Exmar Offshore
CPC-FOCUS F04D · 11 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2023 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Exmar Offshore Company (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Extract’s 46.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (15%) Velocity 16.7 pts (36%) Breadth 11.7 pts (25%) Claim depth 11.1 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Extract Management · this assignee

47
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Extract's Innovation Score is 46.6/100 (top 20% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Extract?

Each dot is one of Extract’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Extract’s own 18.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Extract vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Extract's grants concentrate

Extract Management Company, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Extract sits between Exmar Offshore Company and F Robotics Acquisitions Ltd..

Extract's three-year grant acceleration

Extract Management Company, LLC shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Exmar Offshore

7
Exomens

7
Expose Retail Str…

7
Extenet Systems

7
Extrude to Fill

7
Extundo Incorpora…

7
Eye Lighting Inte…

7
F Robotics Acquis…

7
Extract Management ◀

7

What this shows Extract holds 7 patents at rank #35,256, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Extract

By rank, the assignees closest to #35,256 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Extract's primary technology class.

Extract's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Extract Management Company, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	14.3%
2021	1	14.3%
2022	1	14.3%
2023	4	57.1%

Which technologies does Extract Management Company, LLC patent most?

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 6

E21B - Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells 6

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 4

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 2

F05B - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Wind, Spring, Weight, Inertia OR Like Motors, TO Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids Covered BY Subclasses F03b, F03d AND F03g 1

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 1

H01B - CABLES; CONDUCTORS; INSULATORS; Selection OF Materials FOR Their Conductive, Insulating OR Dielectric Properties 1

H03H - Impedance Networks, e.g. Resonant CIRCUITS; Resonators 1

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 1

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 1

B01D - Separation 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Extract Management Company, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Extract Management Company, LLC's lead technology class is F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F04D
Ranked #35,263 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Extract Management Company, LLC against Exmar Offshore Company, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.