Exomens
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G10H (Electrophonic Musical INSTRUMENTS; Instruments IN Which THE Tones ARE Generated BY Electromechanical Means OR Electronic Generators, OR IN Which THE Tones ARE Synthesised From A Data Store).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Exomens ranks #35,259 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #35,259
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 6th percentile
- by Innovation Score (20.1/100)
- 15.6
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35259 · Foreign Corporation #35,259 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,259/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Evestra
- CPC-NARROW G10H · 1 areas
- INNOV-THIN 20.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Evestra, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Exomens’s 20.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Exomens
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Exomens · this assignee 20
Exomens · this assignee
20 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Exomens's Innovation Score is 20.1/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Exomens?
Each dot is one of Exomens’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Exomens’s own 15.6 claims/patent is at or below the 18.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Exomens's grants concentrate
Exomens is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G10H (Electrophonic Musical INSTRUMENTS; Instruments IN Which THE Tones ARE Generated BY Electromechanical Means OR Electronic Generators, OR IN Which THE Tones ARE Synthesised From A Data Store). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Exomens sits between Evestra, Inc. and Extrude to Fill, Inc..
Who files at Exomens's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Evestra
Evestra, Inc.
7 patents
- Evolva
Evolva, Inc.
7 patents
- Evolve Dental
Evolve Dental Technologies, Inc.
7 patents
- Exmar Offshore
Exmar Offshore Company
7 patents
- Expose Retail Str…
Expose Retail Strategies, Inc.
7 patents
- Extenet Systems
ExteNet Systems, Inc.
7 patents
- Extract Management
Extract Management Company, LLC
7 patents
- Extrude to Fill
Extrude to Fill, Inc.
7 patents
- Exomens ◀
Exomens
7 patents
What this shows Exomens holds 7 patents at rank #35,253, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Exomens
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,253 in granted patent volume.
- Evestra, Inc. #35,249 · 7 patents
- Evolva, Inc. #35,250 · 7 patents
- Evolve Dental Technologies, Inc. #35,251 · 7 patents
- Exmar Offshore Company #35,252 · 7 patents
- Expose Retail Strategies, Inc. #35,254 · 7 patents
- ExteNet Systems, Inc. #35,255 · 7 patents
- Extract Management Company, LLC #35,256 · 7 patents
- Extrude to Fill, Inc. #35,257 · 7 patents
Leaders in G10H (Electrophonic Musical Instruments)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Exomens's primary technology class.
Exomens's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
20 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 71.4% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Exomens patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Exomens's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Exomens's lead technology class is G10H (Electrophonic Musical INSTRUMENTS; Instruments IN Which THE Tones ARE Generated BY Electromechanical Means OR Electronic Generators, OR IN Which THE Tones ARE Synthesised From A Data Store), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G10H
- Ranked #35,259 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Exomens against Evestra, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 20.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.