ETH Zuerich
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 19 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, ETH ranks #22,545 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 19 technology areas.
- #22,545
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 35%
- by Innovation Score (40.8/100)
- 10.8
- avg claims per patent
- -43%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R22545 · Foreign Corporation #22,545 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #22,545/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Eshard
- CPC-FOCUS C08F · 19 areas
- INNOV-PAR 40.8/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -43% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Eshard (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How ETH’s 40.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around ETH
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- ETH Zuerich · this assignee
ETH Zuerich · this assignee
41 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows ETH's Innovation Score is 40.8/100 (top 35% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for ETH?
Each dot is one of ETH’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). ETH’s own 10.8 claims/patent is at or below the 14.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where ETH's grants concentrate
ETH Zuerich is a focused PatentsView assignee: 19 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, ETH sits between Eshard and Excellence Opto. Inc..
ETH's three-year grant acceleration
ETH Zuerich shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at ETH's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Eshard
Eshard
12 patents
- Eski
Eski Inc.
12 patents
- Ess-help
ESS-Help, Inc.
12 patents
- Esthetic Implant…
Esthetic Implant Solutions, LLC
12 patents
- Etrog Systems
Etrog Systems Ltd.
12 patents
- Evonik Fibres
Evonik Fibres GMBH
12 patents
- Exalos
Exalos AG
12 patents
- Excellence Opto
Excellence Opto. Inc.
12 patents
- ETH Zuerich ◀
ETH Zuerich
12 patents
What this shows ETH holds 12 patents at rank #22,510, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near ETH
By rank, the assignees closest to #22,510 in granted patent volume.
- Eshard #22,506 · 12 patents
- Eski Inc. #22,507 · 12 patents
- ESS-Help, Inc. #22,508 · 12 patents
- Esthetic Implant Solutions, LLC #22,509 · 12 patents
- Etrog Systems Ltd. #22,511 · 12 patents
- Evonik Fibres GMBH #22,512 · 12 patents
- Exalos AG #22,513 · 12 patents
- Excellence Opto. Inc. #22,514 · 12 patents
Leaders in C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Invol…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in ETH's primary technology class.
ETH's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
41 Top 35% higher than 65% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2016 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2024 | 3 | 25.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 8.3% |
Which technologies does ETH Zuerich patent most?
Top 15 of 19 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
ETH Zuerich's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- ETH Zuerich's lead technology class is C08F (Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C08F
- Ranked #22,545 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare ETH Zuerich against Eshard, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 40.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.