Environmental Energy Services, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C10L (Fuels NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Natural GAS; Synthetic Natural GAS Obtained BY Processes NOT Covered BY Subclasses C10g OR C10K; Liquified Petroleum GAS; USE OF Additives TO Fuels OR FIRES; Fire-lig).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Environmental ranks #46,528 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #46,528
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 16th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.1/100)
- 14.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R46528 · US Corporation #46,528 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #46,528/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Entex
- CPC-NARROW C10L · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Entex Technologies Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Environmental’s 25.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Environmental
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Environmental… · this assignee 25
Environmental… · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Environmental's Innovation Score is 25.1/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Environmental?
Each dot is one of Environmental’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Environmental’s own 14.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Environmental's grants concentrate
Environmental Energy Services, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under C10L (Fuels NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Natural GAS; Synthetic Natural GAS Obtained BY Processes NOT Covered BY Subclasses C10g OR C10K; Liquified Petroleum GAS; USE OF Additives TO Fuels OR FIRES; Fire-lig). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Environmental sits between Entex Technologies Inc. and Enyx SA.
Who files at Environmental's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Entex
Entex Technologies Inc.
5 patents
- Entos Pharmaceuti…
Entos Pharmaceuticals Inc.
5 patents
- Entsorgafin S P A
Entsorgafin S.P.A.
5 patents
- Entuity
Entuity Limited
5 patents
- Envirosystems
Envirosystems Inc.
5 patents
- Envistacom
Envistacom, LLC
5 patents
- Enxl
Enxl LLC
5 patents
- Enyx
Enyx SA
5 patents
- Environmental Ene… ◀
Environmental Energy Services, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Environmental holds 5 patents at rank #46,435, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Environmental
By rank, the assignees closest to #46,435 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in C10L (Fuels)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Environmental's primary technology class.
Environmental's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Environmental Energy Services, Inc. patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Environmental Energy Services, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Environmental Energy Services, Inc.'s lead technology class is C10L (Fuels NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Natural GAS; Synthetic Natural GAS Obtained BY Processes NOT Covered BY Subclasses C10g OR C10K; Liquified Petroleum GAS; USE OF Additives TO Fuels OR FIRES; Fire-lig), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C10L
- Ranked #46,528 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Environmental Energy Services, Inc. against Entex Technologies Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.