PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co. KG

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 259 granted patents across 79 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Endress+hauser ranks #1,592 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 259 patents across 79 technology areas.

#1,592
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 5%
by Innovation Score (58.1/100)
13.3
avg claims per patent
+55%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R1592 · Foreign Corporation #1,592 · 259 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MID 259 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #1,592/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Apex Brands
  • CPC-WIDE G01N · 79 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 58.1/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 13.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +55% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Apex Brands, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Endress+hauser’s 58.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Endress+hauser

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Endress+hauser's Innovation Score is 58.1/100 (top 5% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Endress+hauser?

Each dot is one of Endress+hauser’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Endress+hauser’s own 13.3 claims/patent is at or below the 18.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Endress+hauser vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 258.5259259.5260260.5 10152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Brocade Communications Systems LLC - 260, 20.48Brocade Communica…Eagle Technology, LLC - 260, 19.45Eagle TechnologyThermo Fisher Scientific (BREMEN) GMBH - 260, 21.68Thermo Fisher Sci…Apex Brands, Inc. - 259, 11.15Apex BrandsIntel Deutschland GmbH - 259, 18.59Intel DeutschlandKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology - 259, 12.69King Abdulaziz Ci…Momentive Performance Materials GmbH - 259, 22.09Momentive Perform…Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. - 259, 11.79Sony Computer Ent…Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co. KG - 259, 13.34Endress+Hauser Co…
Endress+hauser vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How Endress+hauser's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co. KG received 149 grants versus 96 in 2015–2019 (+55% equal-window velocity, above median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2019 at 39 grants and bottomed in 2016 at 13. Lead class G01N accounts for 63.7% of the portfolio across 79 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Brocade Communications Systems LLC (#1,588) and Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. (#1,596).

Endress+hauser's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co. KG moved from 100 to 88 grants (0.88x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #1,552. See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at Endress+Hauser's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Endress+Hauser holds 259 patents at rank #1,592, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Endress+Hauser

By rank, the assignees closest to #1,592 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Endress+Hauser's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Endress+Hauser, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their…), Endress+Hauser ranks #78 of 7,863 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (58 here).

ebm-papst Mulfingen GmbH & Co. KG 58 Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. 58 Katmai Tech Inc. 58 Koenig & Bauer AG 58

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (13.3 here).

Sulzer Management AG 13.3 avg Putzmeister Engineering GmbH 13.3 avg Raytheon Canada Limited 13.3 avg R. Stahl SCHALTGERÄTE GMBH 13.3 avg

Endress+hauser's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

58 Top 5% higher than 95% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1020304050 2016201720182019202020212022202320242025 14
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co. KG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 13 5.0%
2017 24 9.3%
2018 20 7.7%
2019 39 15.1%
2020 28 10.8%
2021 33 12.7%
2022 34 13.1%
2023 34 13.1%
2024 20 7.7%
2025partial year 14 5.4%

Which technologies does Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co. KG patent most?

Top 15 of 79 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co. KG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co. KG's lead technology class is G01N (Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties), 63.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01N
  • Ranked #1,592 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Endress+Hauser Conducta GmbH+Co. KG against Brocade Communications Systems LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 58.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.