Overall rank by patents
#26,196
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 16 technology areas, active 2017–2022. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: Y02E (REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION).
The verdict
EMPA holds 10 US patents across 16 technology areas, rank #26,196 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
EMPA has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2017 and 2022, placing EMPA at rank #26,196 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 16 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 19.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in Y02E (REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION). As a Foreign Corporation, EMPA is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, EMPA sits between Electro Terminal Gmbh & Co KG (10 patents, rank #26,192) and ENN Science AND Technology Development Co., Ltd (10 patents, rank #26,200) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 36.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -75% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. EMPA's 19.9 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 16 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark EMPA against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
ELECTRO TERMINAL GMBH & CO KG
10 patents
ELOBIX AB
10 patents
ELPIDA MEMORY, INC.
10 patents
EMBRACO INDÚSTRIA DE COMPRESSORES E SOLUÇÕES EM REFRIGERAÇÃO LTDA.
10 patents
EMPIRICO INC.
10 patents
ENCOMPASS GROUP, LLC.
10 patents
ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES INSTITUTE LLP
10 patents
ENN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD
10 patents
EMPA
10 patents
What this shows EMPA holds 10 patents at rank #26,196, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
EMPA's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 46% higher than 54% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2018 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 10.0% |
Top 15 of 16 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#26,196
Across all tracked assignees
36.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
EMPA's 10 grants land it in the top 46% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.