Overall rank by patents
#24,244
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 10 technology areas, active 2019–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES).
The verdict
Emage holds 11 US patents across 10 technology areas, rank #24,244 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Emage Vision PTE. Ltd. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2019 and 2023, placing Emage Vision PTE. Ltd. at rank #24,244 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 10 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 10.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES). As a Foreign Corporation, Emage Vision PTE. Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Emage sits between Ehoma Industrial Corporation (11 patents, rank #24,240) and Envirosight Llc (11 patents, rank #24,248) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 28.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 9 grants, compared with 2 in the 2015–2019 window, a +350% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Emage Vision PTE. Ltd.'s 10.6 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 10 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Emage Vision PTE. Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
EHOMA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION
11 patents
ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE, LLC
11 patents
ELM
11 patents
ELYSIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
11 patents
EMS-CHEMIE AG
11 patents
ENERGYBOX LTD.
11 patents
ENIG ASSOCIATES, INC.
11 patents
ENVIROSIGHT LLC
11 patents
EMAGE VISION PTE. LTD.
11 patents
What this shows Emage holds 11 patents at rank #24,244, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Emage's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 Top 72% higher than 28% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2020 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2021 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2023 | 2 | 18.2% |
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,244
Across all tracked assignees
28.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Emage's 11 grants land it in the top 72% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.