Overall rank by patents
#24,258
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G07C (TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FO).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Election ranks #24,258 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 11 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24258 · US Corporation #24,258 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ecovap, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Election Systems & S… · this assignee
37 score
3D Lighting Innovati… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Election's Innovation Score is 37.0/100 (top 45% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Election Systems & Software, Llc is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 81.8% of grants classified under G07C (TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FO). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Election sits between Ecovap, Inc. and Ems-chemie Ag.
Election Systems & Software, Llc shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
ECOVAP, INC.
11 patents
EFFECT PHOTONICS B.V.
11 patents
EGIS GYOCYSZERGYAR NYILVANOSAN MUKODO RESZVENYTARSASAG
11 patents
EHOMA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION
11 patents
ELM
11 patents
ELYSIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
11 patents
EMAGE VISION PTE. LTD.
11 patents
EMS-CHEMIE AG
11 patents
ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE, LLC
11 patents
What this shows Election holds 11 patents at rank #24,241, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,241 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Election's primary technology class.
Election's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 45% higher than 55% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2016 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2018 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2020 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2022 | 1 | 9.1% |
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,258
of 50,000 tracked assignees
37.0 out of 100
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.