Overall rank by patents
#24,278
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 9 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H02K (DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINES).
The verdict
Electric holds 11 US patents across 9 technology areas, rank #24,278 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Electric Torque Machines, Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Electric Torque Machines, Inc. at rank #24,278 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 9 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 21.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in H02K (DYNAMO-ELECTRIC MACHINES). As a US Corporation, Electric Torque Machines, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Electric sits between Edeniq, Inc. (11 patents, rank #24,274) and Embodied Intelligence Inc. (11 patents, rank #24,282) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 45.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 3 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -62% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Electric Torque Machines, Inc.'s 21.1 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 9 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Electric Torque Machines, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Edeniq, Inc.
11 patents
Egg Medical, Inc.
11 patents
Egress Software Technologies IP Limited
11 patents
ElectraTherm, Inc.
11 patents
Elekta AB
11 patents
Elemental Machines, Inc.
11 patents
Eleven Street Co., Ltd.
11 patents
Embodied Intelligence Inc.
11 patents
Electric Torque Machines, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Electric holds 11 patents at rank #24,278, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Electric's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 24% higher than 76% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2016 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2023 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2025 | 1 | 9.1% |
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,278
Across all tracked assignees
45.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Electric's 11 grants land it in the top 24% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.