Egg Medical, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Egg ranks #24,254 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #24,254
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 27%
- by Innovation Score (43.9/100)
- 18.6
- avg claims per patent
- +350%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24254 · US Corporation #24,254 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,254/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ecodyst
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 6 areas
- INNOV-PAR 43.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +350% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ecodyst, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Egg’s 43.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Egg
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Egg Medical · this assignee
Egg Medical · this assignee
44 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Egg's Innovation Score is 43.9/100 (top 27% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Egg?
Each dot is one of Egg’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Egg’s own 18.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Egg's grants concentrate
Egg Medical, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Egg sits between Ecodyst, Inc. and Elekta AB.
Egg's three-year grant acceleration
Egg Medical, Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Egg's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ecodyst
Ecodyst, Inc.
11 patents
- Ecolean AB
Ecolean AB
11 patents
- Ecolibrium Solar
Ecolibrium Solar, Inc.
11 patents
- Edeniq
Edeniq, Inc.
11 patents
- Egress Software IP
Egress Software Technologies IP Limited
11 patents
- Electratherm
ElectraTherm, Inc.
11 patents
- Electric Torque M…
Electric Torque Machines, Inc.
11 patents
- Elekta AB
Elekta AB
11 patents
- Egg Medical ◀
Egg Medical, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Egg holds 11 patents at rank #24,275, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Egg
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,275 in granted patent volume.
- Ecodyst, Inc. #24,271 · 11 patents
- Ecolean AB #24,272 · 11 patents
- Ecolibrium Solar, Inc. #24,273 · 11 patents
- Edeniq, Inc. #24,274 · 11 patents
- Egress Software Technologies IP Limited #24,276 · 11 patents
- ElectraTherm, Inc. #24,277 · 11 patents
- Electric Torque Machines, Inc. #24,278 · 11 patents
- Elekta AB #24,279 · 11 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Egg's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Egg's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
44 Top 27% higher than 73% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2022 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2023 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2024 | 4 | 36.4% |
Which technologies does Egg Medical, Inc. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Egg Medical, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Egg Medical, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #24,254 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Egg Medical, Inc. against Ecodyst, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 43.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.