Where does dynaCERT Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), dynaCERT Inc. ranks #24,230 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does dynaCERT Inc. hold?

dynaCERT Inc. holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2023, spanning 9 technology areas.

What is dynaCERT Inc.'s Innovation Score?

dynaCERT Inc. has an Innovation Score of 37.4 out of 100 (top 44% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does dynaCERT Inc. focus on?

dynaCERT Inc.'s top technology area is F02D (Controlling Combustion Engines) with 9 patents, ranking #130 of 518 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 9 CPC subclasses total.

Is dynaCERT Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

dynaCERT Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +167% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for dynaCERT Inc.'s patents?

dynaCERT Inc.'s patents average 21.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the dynaCERT Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

dynaCERT Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F02D (Controlling Combustion Engines).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, dynacert ranks #24,230 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 9 technology areas.

#24,230
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 44%
by Innovation Score (37.4/100): 21.1
avg claims per patent: +167%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R24230 · Foreign Corporation #24,230 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #24,230/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH becker marine…
CPC-NARROW F02D · 9 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.4/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.1 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +167% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: becker marine systems GmbH Co. KG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How dynacert’s 37.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (23%) Velocity 5.6 pts (15%) Breadth 10.6 pts (28%) Claim depth 12.7 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
dynaCERT · this assignee

37
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows dynacert's Innovation Score is 37.4/100 (top 44% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for dynacert?

Each dot is one of dynacert’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). dynacert’s own 21.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

dynacert vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where dynacert's grants concentrate

dynaCERT Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 81.8% of grants classified under F02D (Controlling Combustion Engines). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, dynacert sits between becker marine systems GmbH Co. KG and iAnywhere Solutions, Inc..

dynacert's three-year grant acceleration

dynaCERT Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

becker marine sys…

11
block one

11
d&b audiotechnik

11
dotloop

11
e-imagedata

11
eever Technology

11
empirical innovat…

11
ianywhere Solutio…

11
dynacert ◀

11

What this shows dynaCERT holds 11 patents at rank #25,599, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near dynaCERT

By rank, the assignees closest to #25,599 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F02D (Controlling Combustion Engines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in dynaCERT's primary technology class.

dynacert's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

dynaCERT Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	3	27.3%
2021	3	27.3%
2022	4	36.4%
2023	1	9.1%

Which technologies does dynaCERT Inc. patent most?

F02D - Controlling Combustion Engines 9

F02M - Supplying Combustion Engines IN General With Combustible Mixtures OR Constituents Thereof 9

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 9

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 5

C25B - Electrolytic OR Electrophoretic Processes FOR THE Production OF Compounds OR NON-METALS; Apparatus Therefor 5

F02B - Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General 3

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 2

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 2

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

dynaCERT Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

dynaCERT Inc.'s lead technology class is F02D (Controlling Combustion Engines), 81.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F02D
Ranked #24,230 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare dynaCERT Inc. against becker marine systems GmbH Co. KG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.