empirical innovations, inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, empirical ranks #24,272 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #24,272
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 45%
- by Innovation Score (36.9/100)
- 18.4
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24272 · US Corporation #24,272 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,272/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH dotloop
- CPC-NARROW A23L · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 36.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: dotloop, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How empirical’s 36.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around empirical
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- empirical innovations · this assignee
empirical innovations · this assignee
37 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows empirical's Innovation Score is 36.9/100 (top 45% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for empirical?
Each dot is one of empirical’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). empirical’s own 18.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where empirical's grants concentrate
empirical innovations, inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 63.6% of grants classified under A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, empirical sits between dotloop, LLC and ionobell, Inc..
empirical's three-year grant acceleration
empirical innovations, inc. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at empirical's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- dotloop
dotloop, LLC
11 patents
- dynacert
dynaCERT Inc.
11 patents
- e-imagedata
e-ImageData Corp.
11 patents
- eever Technology
eEver Technology, Inc.
11 patents
- ianywhere Solutio…
iAnywhere Solutions, Inc.
11 patents
- ifixit
iFixit
11 patents
- imed Technology
iMed Technology, Inc.
11 patents
- ionobell
ionobell, Inc.
11 patents
- empirical innovat… ◀
empirical innovations, inc.
11 patents
What this shows empirical holds 11 patents at rank #25,602, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near empirical
By rank, the assignees closest to #25,602 in granted patent volume.
- dotloop, LLC #25,598 · 11 patents
- dynaCERT Inc. #25,599 · 11 patents
- e-ImageData Corp. #25,600 · 11 patents
- eEver Technology, Inc. #25,601 · 11 patents
- iAnywhere Solutions, Inc. #25,603 · 11 patents
- iFixit #25,604 · 11 patents
- iMed Technology, Inc. #25,605 · 11 patents
- ionobell, Inc. #25,606 · 11 patents
Leaders in A23L (Foods)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in empirical's primary technology class.
empirical's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
37 Top 45% higher than 55% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2021 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2024 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2025partial year | 3 | 27.3% |
Which technologies does empirical innovations, inc. patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
empirical innovations, inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- empirical innovations, inc.'s lead technology class is A23L (Foods, Foodstuffs OR Non-alcoholic Beverages, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preparation OR Treatment Thereof), 63.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A23L
- Ranked #24,272 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare empirical innovations, inc. against dotloop, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 36.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.