Where does DYC Turbines rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), DYC Turbines ranks #46,329 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does DYC Turbines hold?

DYC Turbines holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2022, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is DYC Turbines's Innovation Score?

DYC Turbines has an Innovation Score of 26.6 out of 100 (21st percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does DYC Turbines focus on?

DYC Turbines's top technology area is F23R (Generating Combustion Products OF High Pressure OR High Velocity, e.g. Gas-turbine Combustion Chambers) with 3 patents, ranking #54 of 101 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is DYC Turbines's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

DYC Turbines's recent grant velocity is -33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for DYC Turbines's patents?

DYC Turbines's patents average 15.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the DYC Turbines patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

DYC Turbines

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F23R (Generating Combustion Products OF High Pressure OR High Velocity, e.g. Gas-turbine Combustion Chambers).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, DYC ranks #46,329 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.

#46,329
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 21st percentile
by Innovation Score (26.6/100): 15.2
avg claims per patent: -33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R46329 · US Corporation #46,329 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #46,329/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH DVO
CPC-NARROW F23R · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 26.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.2 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: DVO, Inc (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How DYC’s 26.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (23%) Velocity 3.3 pts (12%) Breadth 7.9 pts (30%) Claim depth 9.1 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
DYC Turbines · this assignee

27
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows DYC's Innovation Score is 26.6/100 (21st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for DYC?

Each dot is one of DYC’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). DYC’s own 15.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

DYC vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where DYC's grants concentrate

DYC Turbines is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under F23R (Generating Combustion Products OF High Pressure OR High Velocity, e.g. Gas-turbine Combustion Chambers). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, DYC sits between DVO, Inc and Dynamic Biosensors GMBH.

DYC's three-year grant acceleration

DYC Turbines shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

DVO

5
DW Lingual System

5
DWK Life Sciences

5
DX Tech PTY

5
Dyflex

5
Dyln Lifestyle

5
DYM Solution

5
Dynamic Biosensors

5
DYC Turbines ◀

5

What this shows DYC holds 5 patents at rank #46,191, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near DYC

By rank, the assignees closest to #46,191 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F23R (Generating Combustion Products OF High Pressure OR High V…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in DYC's primary technology class.

DYC's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 21st percentile higher than 21% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

DYC Turbines patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	2	40.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2021	1	20.0%
2022	1	20.0%

Which technologies does DYC Turbines patent most?

F23R - Generating Combustion Products OF High Pressure OR High Velocity, e.g. Gas-turbine Combustion Chambers 3

F02C - Gas-turbine PLANTS; AIR Intakes FOR Jet-propulsion PLANTS; Controlling Fuel Supply IN Air-breathing Jet-propulsion Plants 2

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 1

F23D - Burners 1

F05D - Indexing Scheme FOR Aspects Relating TO Non-positive-displacement Machines OR Engines, Gas-turbines OR Jet-propulsion Plants 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

DYC Turbines's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

DYC Turbines's lead technology class is F23R (Generating Combustion Products OF High Pressure OR High Velocity, e.g. Gas-turbine Combustion Chambers), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F23R
Ranked #46,329 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare DYC Turbines against DVO, Inc, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 26.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.