PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Dinkle Enterprise Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 81 granted patents across 20 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01R (Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Dinkle ranks #4,376 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 81 patents across 20 technology areas.

#4,376
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 34%
by Innovation Score (41.2/100)
9.4
avg claims per patent
-5%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R4376 · Foreign Corporation #4,376 · 81 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 81 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #4,376/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Children's Healthcar…
  • CPC-FOCUS H01R · 20 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 41.2/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 9.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-FLAT -5% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Dinkle’s 41.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Dinkle

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Dinkle's Innovation Score is 41.2/100 (top 34% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Dinkle?

Each dot is one of Dinkle’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Dinkle’s own 9.4 claims/patent is at or below the 16.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Dinkle vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 80.981.081.08181.081.081.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Clemson University Research Foundation - 81, 17.23Clemson Universit…CVDevices, LLC - 81, 19.8CvdevicesChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta - 81, 16.01Children's Health…Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC - 81, 16.26Consolidated Nucl…ECO Holding 1 GmbH - 81, 13.11ECO Holding 1Eagle Harbor Technologies, Inc. - 81, 20.6Eagle HarborFRIEDRICH-ALEXANDER-UNIVERSITÄT ERLANGEN-NÜRNBERG - 81, 18.6Friedrich-alexand…Gyrus Medical Limited - 81, 13.17Gyrus MedicalDinkle Enterprise Co., Ltd. - 81, 9.4Dinkle Enterprise
Dinkle vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Dinkle's grants concentrate

Dinkle Enterprise Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 20 CPC subclasses with 76.5% of grants classified under H01R (Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (16 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2024. By volume, Dinkle sits between Clemson University Research Foundation and Gyrus Medical Limited.

Dinkle's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Dinkle Enterprise Co., Ltd. moved from 31 to 21 grants (0.68x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at Dinkle's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Dinkle holds 81 patents at rank #4,376, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Dinkle

By rank, the assignees closest to #4,376 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01R (Electrically-conductive Connections)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Dinkle's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Dinkle, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H01R (Electrically-conductive Connections), Dinkle ranks #56 of 2,265 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (41 here).

Dell Software Inc. 41 SunEdison Semiconductor Limited (UEN201334164H) 41 Cognifisense, Inc. 41 Rubbermaid Incorporated 41

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (9.4 here).

Shindengen Electric Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 9.4 avg Universal Entertainment Corporation 9.4 avg Mars, Incorporated 9.4 avg Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd. 9.4 avg

Dinkle's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

41 Top 34% higher than 66% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

05101520 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 7
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Dinkle Enterprise Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 5 6.2%
2016 7 8.6%
2017 5 6.2%
2018 5 6.2%
2019 16 19.8%
2020 9 11.1%
2021 6 7.4%
2022 7 8.6%
2023 11 13.6%
2024 3 3.7%
2025partial year 7 8.6%

Which technologies does Dinkle Enterprise Co., Ltd. patent most?

Top 15 of 20 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Dinkle Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Dinkle Enterprise Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is H01R (Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors), 76.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01R
  • Ranked #4,376 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Dinkle Enterprise Co., Ltd. against Clemson University Research Foundation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 41.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.