USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Dana Graziano S.R.L.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16H (Gearing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Dana ranks #19,645 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 8 technology areas.

#19,645
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 41%
by Innovation Score (38.5/100)
15.2
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19645 · Foreign Corporation #19,645 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
  • MID-PACK #19,645/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH DAE WON SAN UP
  • CPC-NARROW F16H · 8 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 38.5/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: DAE WON SAN UP Co., Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Dana’s 38.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Dana

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Dana's Innovation Score is 38.5/100 (top 41% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Dana?

Each dot is one of Dana’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Dana’s own 15.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Dana vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 13.913.91414.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent D.P. Technology Corp. - 14, 15.43D P TechnologyDAE WON SAN UP Co., Ltd - 14, 11.5DAE WON SAN UPDaihatsu Motor Co., Ltd. - 14, 6.29Daihatsu MotorDaito Giken, Inc. - 14, 4.07Daito GikenDandelion Technologies LLC - 14, 28.14DandelionDanfoss Editron OY - 14, 13.36Danfoss Editron OYDartpoint Tech. Co., Ltd. - 14, 18.5Dartpoint TechDDS Company, Inc. - 14, 15.64DDSDana Graziano S.R.L. - 14, 15.21Dana Graziano S R…
Dana vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Dana's grants concentrate

Dana Graziano S.R.L. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under F16H (Gearing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Dana sits between D.P. Technology Corp. and DDS Company, Inc..

Dana's three-year grant acceleration

Dana Graziano S.R.L. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Dana's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Dana holds 14 patents at rank #19,647, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Dana

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,647 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16H (Gearing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Dana's primary technology class.

Dana's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 202020212022202320242025 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Dana Graziano S.R.L. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2020 3 21.4%
2021 1 7.1%
2022 1 7.1%
2023 1 7.1%
2024 4 28.6%
2025partial year 4 28.6%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Dana Graziano S.R.L.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Dana Graziano S.R.L.'s lead technology class is F16H (Gearing), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16H
  • Ranked #19,645 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Dana Graziano S.R.L. against D.P. Technology Corp., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 38.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.