CyberTAN Technology, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cybertan ranks #39,712 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #39,712
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 39th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.8/100)
- 9.5
- avg claims per patent
- +100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39712 · Foreign Corporation #39,712 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,712/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH CustomPlay
- CPC-NARROW H04W · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.8/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 9.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: CustomPlay LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cybertan’s 31.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cybertan
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- CyberTAN Technology · this assignee 32
CyberTAN Technology · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cybertan's Innovation Score is 31.8/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cybertan?
Each dot is one of Cybertan’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cybertan’s own 9.5 claims/patent is at or below the 18.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Cybertan's grants concentrate
CyberTAN Technology, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Cybertan sits between CustomPlay LLC and Cypralis Limited.
Cybertan's three-year grant acceleration
CyberTAN Technology, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at CyberTAN's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Customplay
CustomPlay LLC
6 patents
- Cutting Edge Visi…
Cutting Edge Vision, LLC
6 patents
- Cvitek
Cvitek Co. Ltd.
6 patents
- Cybel
Cybel, LLC.
6 patents
- Cyberheart
Cyberheart, Inc.
6 patents
- Cydar
Cydar Limited
6 patents
- Cygnvs
Cygnvs Inc.
6 patents
- Cypralis
Cypralis Limited
6 patents
- Cybertan Technolo… ◀
CyberTAN Technology, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows CyberTAN holds 6 patents at rank #39,710, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near CyberTAN
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,710 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in CyberTAN's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 17,987 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 11,683 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 11,202 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 10,885 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 10,282 in class
- Apple Inc. 6,306 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 3,725 in class
- Intel Corporation 3,691 in class
Cybertan's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does CyberTAN Technology, Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
CyberTAN Technology, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- CyberTAN Technology, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
- Ranked #39,712 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare CyberTAN Technology, Inc. against CustomPlay LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.