Cydar Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cydar ranks #39,713 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #39,713
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 20th percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.5/100)
- 19.0
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39713 · Foreign Corporation #39,713 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,713/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cvitek
- CPC-NARROW G06T · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cvitek Co. Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cydar’s 26.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cydar
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cydar · this assignee 26
Cydar · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cydar's Innovation Score is 26.5/100 (20th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cydar?
Each dot is one of Cydar’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cydar’s own 19.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 18.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Cydar's grants concentrate
Cydar Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General). By volume, Cydar sits between Cvitek Co. Ltd. and Cytel Inc..
Cydar's three-year grant acceleration
Cydar Limited shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Cydar's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cvitek
Cvitek Co. Ltd.
6 patents
- Cybel
Cybel, LLC.
6 patents
- Cybertan Technolo…
CyberTAN Technology, Inc.
6 patents
- Cyberheart
Cyberheart, Inc.
6 patents
- Cygnvs
Cygnvs Inc.
6 patents
- Cypralis
Cypralis Limited
6 patents
- Cypress Pharmaceu…
Cypress Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
6 patents
- Cytel
Cytel Inc.
6 patents
- Cydar ◀
Cydar Limited
6 patents
What this shows Cydar holds 6 patents at rank #39,712, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cydar
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,712 in granted patent volume.
- Cvitek Co. Ltd. #39,708 · 6 patents
- Cybel, LLC. #39,709 · 6 patents
- CyberTAN Technology, Inc. #39,710 · 6 patents
- Cyberheart, Inc. #39,711 · 6 patents
- Cygnvs Inc. #39,713 · 6 patents
- Cypralis Limited #39,714 · 6 patents
- Cypress Pharmaceuticals, Inc. #39,715 · 6 patents
- Cytel Inc. #39,716 · 6 patents
Leaders in G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cydar's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,120 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 3,282 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,522 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 2,484 in class
- Intel Corporation 2,439 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 2,389 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 2,281 in class
- Google LLC 2,182 in class
Cydar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 20th percentile higher than 20% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Cydar Limited patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cydar Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cydar Limited's lead technology class is G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06T
- Ranked #39,713 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cydar Limited against Cvitek Co. Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.