USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cyberheart, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cyberheart ranks #39,711 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.

#39,711
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
22nd percentile
by Innovation Score (26.9/100)
23.5
avg claims per patent
-80%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39711 · US Corporation #39,711 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
  • LOWER-Q #39,711/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cutting Edge Vision
  • CPC-NARROW A61N · 3 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 26.9/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 23.5 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -80% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cutting Edge Vision, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cyberheart’s 26.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cyberheart

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Cyberheart's Innovation Score is 26.9/100 (22nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cyberheart?

Each dot is one of Cyberheart’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cyberheart’s own 23.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cyberheart vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 5.96.06.066.06.06.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Cutting Edge Vision, LLC - 6, 11.17Cutting Edge Visi…Cvitek Co. Ltd. - 6, 11.5CvitekCybel, LLC. - 6, 19.5CybelCyberTAN Technology, Inc. - 6, 9.5Cybertan Technolo…Cydar Limited - 6, 19CydarCygnvs Inc. - 6, 22.67CygnvsCypralis Limited - 6, 18.83CypralisCypress Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - 6, 17.5Cypress Pharmaceu…Cyberheart, Inc. - 6, 23.5Cyberheart
Cyberheart vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cyberheart's grants concentrate

Cyberheart, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Cyberheart sits between Cutting Edge Vision, LLC and Cypress Pharmaceuticals, Inc..

Who files at Cyberheart's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Cyberheart holds 6 patents at rank #39,711, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Cyberheart

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,711 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61N (Electrotherapy)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cyberheart's primary technology class.

Cyberheart's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 22nd percentile higher than 22% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 2015201620182020 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Cyberheart, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 16.7%
2016 2 33.3%
2018 2 33.3%
2020 1 16.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Cyberheart, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Cyberheart, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61N
  • Ranked #39,711 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Cyberheart, Inc. against Cutting Edge Vision, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 26.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.