Overall rank by patents
#31,232
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 12 technology areas, active 2015–2018. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: Y10T (TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION).
The verdict
Cubic holds 8 US patents across 12 technology areas, rank #31,232 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Cubic TECH Corporation has been granted 8 US utility patents between 2015 and 2018, placing Cubic TECH Corporation at rank #31,232 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 12 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in Y10T (TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION). As a US Corporation, Cubic TECH Corporation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cubic sits between CSE Co., Ltd. (8 patents, rank #31,228) and CY Cergy Paris Universite (8 patents, rank #31,236) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Cubic TECH Corporation's 18.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 12 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Cubic TECH Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
CSE CO., LTD.
8 patents
CSTONE PHARMACEUTICALS
8 patents
CTI BIOPHARMA CORP.
8 patents
CTRL-labs Corporation
8 patents
CURV BRANDS, LLC
8 patents
CUSIC INC.
8 patents
CUTTING EDGE SPINE LLC
8 patents
CY CERGY PARIS UNIVERSITE
8 patents
CUBIC TECH CORPORATION
8 patents
What this shows Cubic holds 8 patents at rank #31,232, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,232 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cubic's primary technology class.
Cubic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 64% higher than 36% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2016 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2018 | 2 | 25.0% |
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#31,232
Across all tracked assignees
30.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Cubic's 8 grants land it in the top 64% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.