USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cubic TECH Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 12 technology areas, active 2015–2018. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: Y10T (TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION).

8
Total patents granted
12
CPC technology areas
18.4
Avg claims per patent
-100%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Cubic holds 8 US patents across 12 technology areas, rank #31,232 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#31,232
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 64%
by Innovation Score (30.9/100)
18.4
avg claims per patent
-100%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Cubic TECH Corporation has been granted 8 US utility patents between 2015 and 2018, placing Cubic TECH Corporation at rank #31,232 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 12 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in Y10T (TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION). As a US Corporation, Cubic TECH Corporation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Cubic sits between CSE Co., Ltd. (8 patents, rank #31,228) and CY Cergy Paris Universite (8 patents, rank #31,236) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Cubic TECH Corporation's 18.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 12 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Cubic TECH Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Cubic's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Cubic holds 8 patents at rank #31,232, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Cubic

By rank, the assignees closest to #31,232 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cubic's primary technology class.

Cubic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 Top 64% higher than 36% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). This entry sits in this band. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 2015201620172018 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Cubic TECH Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 37.5%
2016 2 25.0%
2017 1 12.5%
2018 2 25.0%

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Declining

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#31,232

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

30.9 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Cubic TECH Corporation hold?
Cubic TECH Corporation holds 8 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2018, spanning 12 technology areas.
What is Cubic TECH Corporation's Innovation Score?
Cubic TECH Corporation has an Innovation Score of 30.9 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Cubic TECH Corporation focus on?
Cubic TECH Corporation's top technology area is Y10T (TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION) with 7 patents. The company has filed patents in 12 CPC subclasses total.
Is Cubic TECH Corporation's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Cubic TECH Corporation's recent filing velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for Cubic TECH Corporation's patents?
Cubic TECH Corporation's patents average 18.4 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Cubic TECH Corporation patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Cubic's 8 grants land it in the top 64% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Cubic ranks #31,232 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in Y10T - see who else leads that technology area. Y10T leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.