Where does Cubic Tech Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Cubic Tech Corporation ranks #31,329 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Cubic Tech Corporation hold?

Cubic Tech Corporation holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2018, spanning 12 technology areas.

What is Cubic Tech Corporation's Innovation Score?

Cubic Tech Corporation has an Innovation Score of 30.9 out of 100 (36th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Cubic Tech Corporation focus on?

Cubic Tech Corporation's top technology area is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification) with 7 patents, ranking #1,744 of 9,657 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 12 CPC subclasses total.

Is Cubic Tech Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Cubic Tech Corporation's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Cubic Tech Corporation's patents?

Cubic Tech Corporation's patents average 18.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Cubic Tech Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cubic Tech Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cubic ranks #31,329 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 12 technology areas.

#31,329
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 36th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.9/100): 18.4
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R31329 · US Corporation #31,329 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #31,329/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH CSE
CPC-FOCUS Y10T · 12 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.9/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: CSE Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cubic’s 30.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (25%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 12.2 pts (40%) Claim depth 11.0 pts (36%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Cubic Tech · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Cubic's Innovation Score is 30.9/100 (36th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cubic?

Each dot is one of Cubic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cubic’s own 18.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cubic vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cubic's grants concentrate

Cubic Tech Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 87.5% of grants classified under Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Cubic sits between CSE Co., Ltd. and CY Cergy Paris Universite.

CSE

8
Cstone Pharmaceut…

8
CTI Biopharma

8
Ctrl-labs

8
Curv Brands

8
Cusic

8
Cutting Edge Spine

8
CY Cergy Paris Un…

8
Cubic Tech ◀

8

What this shows Cubic holds 8 patents at rank #31,232, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Cubic

By rank, the assignees closest to #31,232 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cubic's primary technology class.

Cubic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 36th percentile higher than 36% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2018

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Cubic Tech Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	37.5%
2016	2	25.0%
2017	1	12.5%
2018	2	25.0%

Which technologies does Cubic Tech Corporation patent most?

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 7

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 5

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 2

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 2

A43B - Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear 2

B29K - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses B29b, B29c OR B29d, Relating TO Moulding Materials OR TO Materials FOR ; Moulds, ; Reinforcements, Fillers OR Preformed Parts, e.g. Inserts 2

B29D - Producing Particular Articles From Plastics OR From Substances IN A Plastic State 2

D06P - Dyeing OR Printing TEXTILES; Dyeing Leather, Furs OR Solid Macromolecular Substances IN ANY Form 2

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

H05K - Printed CIRCUITS; Casings OR Constructional Details OF Electric APPARATUS; Manufacture OF Assemblages OF Electrical Components 2

B05D - Processes FOR Applying Fluent Materials TO Surfaces, IN General 2

H04M - Telephonic Communication 1

Top 12 of 12 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Cubic Tech Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Cubic Tech Corporation's lead technology class is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification), 87.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y10T
Ranked #31,329 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Cubic Tech Corporation against CSE Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.