Overall rank by patents
#3,698
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 98 granted patents across 54 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H01P (WAVEGUIDES; RESONATORS, LINES, OR OTHER DEVICES OF THE WAVEGUIDE TYPE).
The verdict
CTS holds 98 US patents across 54 technology areas, rank #3,698 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
CTS Corporation has been granted 98 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing CTS Corporation at rank #3,698 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 54 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 10.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in H01P (WAVEGUIDES; RESONATORS, LINES, OR OTHER DEVICES OF THE WAVEGUIDE TYPE). As a US Corporation, CTS Corporation is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, CTS sits between Wheel Group Holdings, Llc (99 patents, rank #3,694) and Hirata Corporation (98 patents, rank #3,702) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 50.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 37 grants, compared with 61 in the 2015–2019 window, a -39% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. CTS Corporation's 10.8 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while a multi-domain presence across 54 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark CTS Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
WHEEL GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC
99 patents
AICHI STEEL CORPORATION
98 patents
Adient Luxembourg Holding S.a.r.l.
98 patents
Biosense Webster, Inc.
98 patents
CureVac AG
98 patents
Delta T, LLC
98 patents
FLIR Systems AB
98 patents
HIRATA CORPORATION
98 patents
CTS CORPORATION
98 patents
What this shows CTS holds 98 patents at rank #3,698, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #3,698 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in CTS's primary technology class.
CTS's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 11 | 11.2% |
| 2016 | 16 | 16.3% |
| 2017 | 7 | 7.1% |
| 2018 | 9 | 9.2% |
| 2019 | 18 | 18.4% |
| 2020 | 8 | 8.2% |
| 2021 | 7 | 7.1% |
| 2022 | 6 | 6.1% |
| 2023 | 3 | 3.1% |
| 2024 | 6 | 6.1% |
| 2025 | 7 | 7.1% |
Top 15 of 54 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#3,698
Across all tracked assignees
50.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
CTS's 98 grants land it in the top 13% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.