Cooper Crouse-hinds GMBH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F21V (Functional Features OR Details OF Lighting Devices OR Systems THEREOF; Structural Combinations OF Lighting Devices With Other Articles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cooper ranks #24,139 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #24,139
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 15th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.7/100)
- 10.2
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24139 · Foreign Corporation #24,139 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,139/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Compac
- CPC-NARROW F21V · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.7/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Compac Technologies Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cooper’s 24.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cooper
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cooper Crouse-hinds · this assignee 25
Cooper Crouse-hinds · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cooper's Innovation Score is 24.7/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cooper?
Each dot is one of Cooper’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cooper’s own 10.2 claims/patent is at or below the 16.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Cooper's grants concentrate
Cooper Crouse-hinds GMBH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 45.5% of grants classified under F21V (Functional Features OR Details OF Lighting Devices OR Systems THEREOF; Structural Combinations OF Lighting Devices With Other Articles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (6 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2017. By volume, Cooper sits between Compac Technologies Limited and Coreteq Systems Ltd.
Who files at Cooper's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Compac
Compac Technologies Limited
11 patents
- Constru
Constru Ltd
11 patents
- Content Square Is…
Content Square Israel Ltd
11 patents
- Convey
Convey, LLC
11 patents
- Coors Brewing
Coors Brewing Company
11 patents
- Coprecitec S L
Coprecitec, S.L.
11 patents
- Corcym S R L
Corcym S.R.L.
11 patents
- Coreteq Systems
Coreteq Systems Ltd
11 patents
- Cooper Crouse-hin… ◀
Cooper Crouse-hinds GMBH
11 patents
What this shows Cooper holds 11 patents at rank #24,081, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cooper
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,081 in granted patent volume.
- Compac Technologies Limited #24,077 · 11 patents
- Constru Ltd #24,078 · 11 patents
- Content Square Israel Ltd #24,079 · 11 patents
- Convey, LLC #24,080 · 11 patents
- Coors Brewing Company #24,082 · 11 patents
- Coprecitec, S.L. #24,083 · 11 patents
- Corcym S.R.L. #24,084 · 11 patents
- Coreteq Systems Ltd #24,085 · 11 patents
Leaders in F21V (Functional Features OR Details OF Lighting Devices OR Sys…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cooper's primary technology class.
Cooper's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2016 | 6 | 54.5% |
| 2017 | 2 | 18.2% |
Which technologies does Cooper Crouse-hinds GMBH patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cooper Crouse-hinds GMBH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cooper Crouse-hinds GMBH's lead technology class is F21V (Functional Features OR Details OF Lighting Devices OR Systems THEREOF; Structural Combinations OF Lighting Devices With Other Articles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 45.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F21V
- Ranked #24,139 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cooper Crouse-hinds GMBH against Compac Technologies Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.