Compac Technologies Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65G (Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Compac ranks #24,127 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #24,127
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 27th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.3/100)
- 18.4
- avg claims per patent
- -78%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24127 · Foreign Corporation #24,127 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,127/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Codonics
- CPC-NARROW B65G · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -78% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Codonics, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Compac’s 28.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Compac
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Compac · this assignee 28
Compac · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Compac's Innovation Score is 28.3/100 (27th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Compac?
Each dot is one of Compac’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Compac’s own 18.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Compac's grants concentrate
Compac Technologies Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 81.8% of grants classified under B65G (Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Compac sits between Codonics, Inc. and Cooper Crouse-hinds GMBH.
Who files at Compac's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Codonics
Codonics, Inc.
11 patents
- Colt's Manufactur…
Colt's Manufacturing Company LLC
11 patents
- Columbia Universi…
Columbia University
11 patents
- Commerce Signals
Commerce Signals, Inc.
11 patents
- Constru
Constru Ltd
11 patents
- Content Square Is…
Content Square Israel Ltd
11 patents
- Convey
Convey, LLC
11 patents
- Cooper Crouse-hin…
Cooper Crouse-hinds GMBH
11 patents
- Compac ◀
Compac Technologies Limited
11 patents
What this shows Compac holds 11 patents at rank #24,077, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Compac
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,077 in granted patent volume.
- Codonics, Inc. #24,073 · 11 patents
- Colt's Manufacturing Company LLC #24,074 · 11 patents
- Columbia University #24,075 · 11 patents
- Commerce Signals, Inc. #24,076 · 11 patents
- Constru Ltd #24,078 · 11 patents
- Content Square Israel Ltd #24,079 · 11 patents
- Convey, LLC #24,080 · 11 patents
- Cooper Crouse-hinds GMBH #24,081 · 11 patents
Leaders in B65G (Transport OR Storage Devices)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Compac's primary technology class.
Compac's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 27th percentile higher than 27% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2016 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2017 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2018 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2020 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 9.1% |
Which technologies does Compac Technologies Limited patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Compac Technologies Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Compac Technologies Limited's lead technology class is B65G (Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors), 81.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65G
- Ranked #24,127 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Compac Technologies Limited against Codonics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.