Where does Content Square Israel Ltd rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Content Square Israel Ltd ranks #24,134 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Content Square Israel Ltd hold?

Content Square Israel Ltd holds 11 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2024, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Content Square Israel Ltd's Innovation Score?

Content Square Israel Ltd has an Innovation Score of 46.6 out of 100 (top 20% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Content Square Israel Ltd focus on?

Content Square Israel Ltd's top technology area is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication) with 11 patents, ranking #2,214 of 8,956 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Content Square Israel Ltd's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Content Square Israel Ltd.

What does claim depth mean for Content Square Israel Ltd's patents?

Content Square Israel Ltd's patents average 19.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Content Square Israel Ltd patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Content Square Israel Ltd

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Content ranks #24,134 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 3 technology areas.

#24,134
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 20%
by Innovation Score (46.6/100): 19.8
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R24134 · Foreign Corporation #24,134 · 11 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
MID-PACK #24,134/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Columbia University
CPC-NARROW H04L · 3 areas
INNOV-PAR 46.6/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Columbia University (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Content’s 46.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.6 pts (18%) Velocity 20.0 pts (43%) Breadth 6.1 pts (13%) Claim depth 11.9 pts (26%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Content Square Israel · this assignee

47
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Content's Innovation Score is 46.6/100 (top 20% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Content?

Each dot is one of Content’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Content’s own 19.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Content vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Content's grants concentrate

Content Square Israel Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Content sits between Columbia University and Coprecitec, S.L..

Content's three-year grant acceleration

Content Square Israel Ltd shows 10 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Columbia Universi…

11
Commerce Signals

11
Compac

11
Constru

11
Convey

11
Cooper Crouse-hin…

11
Coors Brewing

11
Coprecitec S L

11
Content Square Is… ◀

11

What this shows Content holds 11 patents at rank #24,079, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Content

By rank, the assignees closest to #24,079 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Content's primary technology class.

Content's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

47 Top 20% higher than 80% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Content Square Israel Ltd patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	9.1%
2022	5	45.5%
2023	1	9.1%
2024	4	36.4%

Which technologies does Content Square Israel Ltd patent most?

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 11

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 9

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 4

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Content Square Israel Ltd's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Content Square Israel Ltd's lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
Ranked #24,134 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Content Square Israel Ltd against Columbia University, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 46.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.