Where does Coolbrook OY rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Coolbrook OY ranks #39,604 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Coolbrook OY hold?

Coolbrook OY holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is Coolbrook OY's Innovation Score?

Coolbrook OY has an Innovation Score of 32.9 out of 100 (43rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Coolbrook OY focus on?

Coolbrook OY's top technology area is B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus) with 5 patents, ranking #812 of 2,755 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

Is Coolbrook OY's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Coolbrook OY's recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Coolbrook OY's patents?

Coolbrook OY's patents average 28.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Coolbrook OY patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Coolbrook OY

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Coolbrook ranks #39,604 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 10 technology areas.

#39,604
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 43rd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.9/100): 28.7
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39604 · Foreign Corporation #39,604 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #39,604/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Conseil ET Technique
CPC-FOCUS B01J · 10 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.9/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 28.7 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Conseil ET Technique (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Coolbrook’s 32.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (20%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.2 pts (34%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (46%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Coolbrook OY · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Coolbrook's Innovation Score is 32.9/100 (43rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Coolbrook?

Each dot is one of Coolbrook’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Coolbrook’s own 28.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Coolbrook vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Coolbrook's grants concentrate

Coolbrook OY is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Coolbrook sits between Conseil ET Technique and Core Link AB.

Conseil ET Techni…

6
Consensus Orthope…

6
Consensus Point

6
Cookpad

6
Cooltech

6
Copperwatts

6
Cordstrap B V

6
Core Link AB

6
Coolbrook OY ◀

6

What this shows Coolbrook holds 6 patents at rank #39,429, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Coolbrook

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,429 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Coolbrook's primary technology class.

Coolbrook's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Coolbrook OY patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	2	33.3%
2020	1	16.7%
2025partial year	3	50.0%

Which technologies does Coolbrook OY patent most?

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 5

C10G - Cracking Hydrocarbon OILS; Production OF Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixtures, e.g. BY Destructive Hydrogenation, Oligomerisation, Polymerisation ; Recovery OF Hydrocarbon Oils From Oil-shale, Oil-sand, OR GASES; Refining Mixtures Mainly Consisting OF HYDROCARBONS; Reforming OF NAPHTHA; Mineral Waxes 3

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 2

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 2

C07C - Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds 1

F01D - Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines 1

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 1

F02C - Gas-turbine PLANTS; AIR Intakes FOR Jet-propulsion PLANTS; Controlling Fuel Supply IN Air-breathing Jet-propulsion Plants 1

F24H - Fluid Heaters, e.g. Water OR AIR Heaters, Having Heat-generating Means, e.g. Heat Pumps, IN General 1

B01F - Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing 1

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Coolbrook OY's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Coolbrook OY's lead technology class is B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01J
Ranked #39,604 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Coolbrook OY against Conseil ET Technique, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.