Overall rank by patents
#39,425
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 13 technology areas, active 2017–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B29C (SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING).
The verdict
Conseil holds 6 US patents across 13 technology areas, rank #39,425 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Conseil ET Technique has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2017 and 2024, placing Conseil ET Technique at rank #39,425 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 13 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 9.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in B29C (SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING). As a Foreign Corporation, Conseil ET Technique is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Conseil sits between Concentric Software, Inc. (6 patents, rank #39,421) and Coolbrook OY (6 patents, rank #39,429) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 45.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 2 in the 2015–2019 window, a +100% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Conseil ET Technique's 9.2 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 13 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Conseil ET Technique against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
CONCENTRIC SOFTWARE, INC.
6 patents
CONCENTRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
6 patents
CONEW NETWORK TECHNOLOGY (BEIJING) CO., LTD.
6 patents
CONNECTEC JAPAN Corporation
6 patents
CONSENSUS ORTHOPEDICS, INC.
6 patents
CONSENSUS POINT, INC.
6 patents
COOKPAD INC.
6 patents
COOLBROOK OY
6 patents
CONSEIL ET TECHNIQUE
6 patents
What this shows Conseil holds 6 patents at rank #39,425, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,425 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Conseil's primary technology class.
Conseil's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 24% higher than 76% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 33.3% |
Top 13 of 13 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#39,425
Across all tracked assignees
45.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Conseil's 6 grants land it in the top 24% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.