Cordstrap B.V.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60P (Vehicles Adapted FOR Load Transportation OR TO Transport, TO Carry, OR TO Comprise Special Loads OR Objects).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cordstrap ranks #39,610 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #39,610
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 40%
- by Innovation Score (38.6/100)
- 19.2
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39610 · Foreign Corporation #39,610 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,610/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Cookpad
- CPC-NARROW B60P · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 38.6/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Cookpad Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cordstrap’s 38.6 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cordstrap
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cordstrap B V · this assignee
Cordstrap B V · this assignee
39 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cordstrap's Innovation Score is 38.6/100 (top 40% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cordstrap?
Each dot is one of Cordstrap’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cordstrap’s own 19.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Cordstrap's grants concentrate
Cordstrap B.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under B60P (Vehicles Adapted FOR Load Transportation OR TO Transport, TO Carry, OR TO Comprise Special Loads OR Objects). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Cordstrap sits between Cookpad Inc. and Cornerstone Intellectual Property, LLC.
Cordstrap's three-year grant acceleration
Cordstrap B.V. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Cordstrap's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Cookpad
Cookpad Inc.
6 patents
- Coolbrook OY
Coolbrook OY
6 patents
- Cooltech
Cooltech, LLC
6 patents
- Copperwatts
Copperwatts LLC
6 patents
- Core Link AB
Core Link AB
6 patents
- Corinex Communica…
Corinex Communications Corporation
6 patents
- Cormetech
Cormetech, Inc.
6 patents
- Cornerstone Intel…
Cornerstone Intellectual Property, LLC
6 patents
- Cordstrap B V ◀
Cordstrap B.V.
6 patents
What this shows Cordstrap holds 6 patents at rank #39,432, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cordstrap
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,432 in granted patent volume.
- Cookpad Inc. #39,428 · 6 patents
- Coolbrook OY #39,429 · 6 patents
- Cooltech, LLC #39,430 · 6 patents
- Copperwatts LLC #39,431 · 6 patents
- Core Link AB #39,433 · 6 patents
- Corinex Communications Corporation #39,434 · 6 patents
- Cormetech, Inc. #39,435 · 6 patents
- Cornerstone Intellectual Property, LLC #39,436 · 6 patents
Leaders in B60P (Vehicles Adapted FOR Load Transportation OR TO Transport)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cordstrap's primary technology class.
Cordstrap's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
39 Top 40% higher than 60% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Cordstrap B.V. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cordstrap B.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cordstrap B.V.'s lead technology class is B60P (Vehicles Adapted FOR Load Transportation OR TO Transport, TO Carry, OR TO Comprise Special Loads OR Objects), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60P
- Ranked #39,610 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cordstrap B.V. against Cookpad Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 38.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.