Overall rank by patents
#24,157
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 19 technology areas, active 2015–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL).
The verdict
Contitech holds 11 US patents across 19 technology areas, rank #24,157 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Contitech MGW Gmbh has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2015 and 2024, placing Contitech MGW Gmbh at rank #24,157 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 19 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in F16L (PIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL). As a Foreign Corporation, Contitech MGW Gmbh is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Contitech sits between Company Of Motion, Llc (11 patents, rank #24,153) and Corelase Oy (11 patents, rank #24,161) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 47.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 7 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a +75% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Contitech MGW Gmbh's 11.4 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 19 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Contitech MGW Gmbh against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Company of Motion, LLC
11 patents
Comrod AS
11 patents
Concept Group LLC
11 patents
Conductix Wampfler France
11 patents
ContiTech Techno-Chemie GmbH
11 patents
Continuum Dynamics, Inc.
11 patents
Cordio Medical Ltd.
11 patents
Corelase Oy
11 patents
ContiTech MGW GmbH
11 patents
What this shows Contitech holds 11 patents at rank #24,157, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Contitech's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 18% higher than 82% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2018 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2020 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2022 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2024 | 1 | 9.1% |
Top 15 of 19 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,157
Across all tracked assignees
47.5 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Contitech's 11 grants land it in the top 18% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.