Concept Group LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Concept ranks #24,131 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #24,131
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 49th percentile
- by Innovation Score (34.8/100)
- 18.6
- avg claims per patent
- +167%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24131 · US Corporation #24,131 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,131/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Common Sensing
- CPC-FOCUS A47J · 12 areas
- INNOV-THIN 34.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +167% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Common Sensing Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Concept’s 34.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Concept
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Concept Group · this assignee
Concept Group · this assignee
35 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Concept's Innovation Score is 34.8/100 (49th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Concept?
Each dot is one of Concept’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Concept’s own 18.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Concept's grants concentrate
Concept Group LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 45.5% of grants classified under A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Concept sits between Common Sensing Inc. and Continuum Dynamics, Inc..
Concept's three-year grant acceleration
Concept Group LLC shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Concept's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Common Sensing
Common Sensing Inc.
11 patents
- Compact Membrane…
Compact Membrane Systems, Inc.
11 patents
- of Motion
Company of Motion, LLC
11 patents
- Comrod AS
Comrod AS
11 patents
- Conductix Wampfle…
Conductix Wampfler France
11 patents
- Contitech MGW
ContiTech MGW GmbH
11 patents
- Contitech Techno-…
ContiTech Techno-Chemie GmbH
11 patents
- Continuum Dynamics
Continuum Dynamics, Inc.
11 patents
- Concept Group ◀
Concept Group LLC
11 patents
What this shows Concept holds 11 patents at rank #24,155, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Concept
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,155 in granted patent volume.
- Common Sensing Inc. #24,151 · 11 patents
- Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. #24,152 · 11 patents
- Company of Motion, LLC #24,153 · 11 patents
- Comrod AS #24,154 · 11 patents
- Conductix Wampfler France #24,156 · 11 patents
- ContiTech MGW GmbH #24,157 · 11 patents
- ContiTech Techno-Chemie GmbH #24,158 · 11 patents
- Continuum Dynamics, Inc. #24,159 · 11 patents
Leaders in A47J (Kitchen Equipment)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Concept's primary technology class.
Concept's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 49th percentile higher than 49% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2019 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2020 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2021 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2023 | 2 | 18.2% |
Which technologies does Concept Group LLC patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Concept Group LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Concept Group LLC's lead technology class is A47J (Kitchen EQUIPMENT; Coffee MILLS; Spice MILLS; Apparatus FOR Making Beverages), 45.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47J
- Ranked #24,131 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Concept Group LLC against Common Sensing Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 34.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.