PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Conductix-Wampfler GmbH

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 35 granted patents across 22 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60L (Propulsion OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Supplying Electric Power FOR Auxiliary Equipment OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Electrodynamic Brake Systems FOR Vehicles IN General ; Magnetic SU).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Conductix-wampfler ranks #9,010 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 35 patents across 22 technology areas.

#9,010
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 13%
by Innovation Score (50.5/100)
18.4
avg claims per patent
+13%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R9010 · Foreign Corporation #9,010 · 35 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 35 grants
  • UPPER-Q #9,010/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cista System
  • CPC-FOCUS B60L · 22 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 50.5/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 18.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-UP +13% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cista System Corp. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Conductix-wampfler’s 50.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Conductix-wampfler

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Conductix-wampfler's Innovation Score is 50.5/100 (top 13% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Conductix-wampfler?

Each dot is one of Conductix-wampfler’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Conductix-wampfler’s own 18.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Conductix-wampfler vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 34.935.035.03535.035.035.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Cista System Corp. - 35, 18.31Cista SystemClarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC - 35, 6Clarkwestern Diet…Click Therapeutics, Inc. - 35, 15.43Click TherapeuticsColorTokens Inc. - 35, 13.51ColortokensCorrelated Magnetics Research, LLC - 35, 21.51Correlated Magnet…Cybex International, Inc. - 35, 16.97Cybex Internation…Danby Products Limited - 35, 15.57Danby ProductsDanfoss Silicon Power GMBH - 35, 15.91Danfoss Silicon P…Conductix-Wampfler GmbH - 35, 18.37Conductix-wampfler
Conductix-wampfler vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Conductix-wampfler's grants concentrate

Conductix-Wampfler GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 22 CPC subclasses with 74.3% of grants classified under B60L (Propulsion OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Supplying Electric Power FOR Auxiliary Equipment OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Electrodynamic Brake Systems FOR Vehicles IN General ; Magnetic SU). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (7 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2018. By volume, Conductix-wampfler sits between Cista System Corp. and Danfoss Silicon Power GMBH.

Conductix-wampfler's three-year grant acceleration

Conductix-Wampfler GmbH shows 11 grants in 2022–2024 against only 7 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Conductix-Wampfler's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Conductix-Wampfler holds 35 patents at rank #9,011, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Conductix-Wampfler

By rank, the assignees closest to #9,011 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B60L (Propulsion OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Conductix-Wampfler's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Conductix-Wampfler, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B60L (Propulsion OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles), Conductix-Wampfler ranks #110 of 1,396 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (50 here).

Voco GmbH 50 Fujitsu TEN Limited 50 5.11, Inc. 50 Huanic Corporation 50

Conductix-wampfler's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

50 Top 13% higher than 87% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 2015201620172018202020212022202320242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Conductix-Wampfler GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 8.6%
2016 4 11.4%
2017 7 20.0%
2018 2 5.7%
2020 5 14.3%
2021 2 5.7%
2022 3 8.6%
2023 2 5.7%
2024 6 17.1%
2025partial year 1 2.9%

Which technologies does Conductix-Wampfler GmbH patent most?

Top 15 of 22 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Conductix-Wampfler GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Conductix-Wampfler GmbH's lead technology class is B60L (Propulsion OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Supplying Electric Power FOR Auxiliary Equipment OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Electrodynamic Brake Systems FOR Vehicles IN General ; Magnetic SU), 74.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60L
  • Ranked #9,010 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Conductix-Wampfler GmbH against Cista System Corp., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 50.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.