Overall rank by patents
#45,927
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 12 technology areas, active 2015–2015. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F01D (NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES).
The verdict
Concepts holds 5 US patents across 12 technology areas, rank #45,927 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Concepts ETI, Inc. has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2015 and 2015, placing Concepts ETI, Inc. at rank #45,927 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 12 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 27.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in F01D (NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES). As a US Corporation, Concepts ETI, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Concepts sits between Composite Technologies, Llc (5 patents, rank #45,923) and Conflu3nce Ltd. (5 patents, rank #45,931) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 33.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Concepts ETI, Inc.'s 27.4 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 12 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Concepts ETI, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Composite Technologies, LLC
5 patents
Compression Therapy Concepts, Inc.
5 patents
Compression Works, LLC
5 patents
Comptek Solutions Oy
5 patents
Condevo S.P.A.
5 patents
ConeCraft, Inc.
5 patents
Conex IPR Limited
5 patents
Conflu3nce Ltd.
5 patents
Concepts ETI, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Concepts holds 5 patents at rank #45,927, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #45,927 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Concepts's primary technology class.
Concepts's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 Top 56% higher than 44% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | 100.0% |
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#45,927
Across all tracked assignees
33.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Concepts's 5 grants land it in the top 56% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.