Where does Concepts ETI, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Concepts ETI, Inc. ranks #45,831 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Concepts ETI, Inc. hold?

Concepts ETI, Inc. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2015, spanning 12 technology areas.

What is Concepts ETI, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Concepts ETI, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 33.4 out of 100 (44th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Concepts ETI, Inc. focus on?

Concepts ETI, Inc.'s top technology area is F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines) with 4 patents, ranking #153 of 462 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 12 CPC subclasses total.

Is Concepts ETI, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Concepts ETI, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Concepts ETI, Inc.'s patents?

Concepts ETI, Inc.'s patents average 27.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Concepts ETI, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Concepts ETI, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2015. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Concepts ranks #45,831 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 12 technology areas.

#45,831
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 44th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.4/100): 27.4
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R45831 · US Corporation #45,831 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #45,831/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Composite
CPC-FOCUS F01D · 12 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.4/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 27.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Composite Technologies, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Concepts’s 33.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (19%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 12.2 pts (37%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (45%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Concepts ETI · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Concepts's Innovation Score is 33.4/100 (44th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Concepts?

Each dot is one of Concepts’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Concepts’s own 27.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 18.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Concepts vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Concepts's grants concentrate

Concepts ETI, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines). By volume, Concepts sits between Composite Technologies, LLC and Conflu3nce Ltd..

Composite

5
Compression Thera…

5
Compression Works

5
Comptek Solutions…

5
Condevo S P A

5
Conecraft

5
Conex IPR

5
Conflu3nce

5
Concepts ETI ◀

5

What this shows Concepts holds 5 patents at rank #45,927, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Concepts

By rank, the assignees closest to #45,927 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Concepts's primary technology class.

Concepts's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 44th percentile higher than 44% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Concepts ETI, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	5	100.0%

Which technologies does Concepts ETI, Inc. patent most?

F01D - Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines 4

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 3

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 2

F05D - Indexing Scheme FOR Aspects Relating TO Non-positive-displacement Machines OR Engines, Gas-turbines OR Jet-propulsion Plants 2

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 2

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

F03B - Machines OR Engines FOR Liquids 1

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 1

F02C - Gas-turbine PLANTS; AIR Intakes FOR Jet-propulsion PLANTS; Controlling Fuel Supply IN Air-breathing Jet-propulsion Plants 1

H02K - Dynamo-electric Machines 1

F01K - Steam Engine PLANTS; Steam ACCUMULATORS; Engine Plants NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Engines Using Special Working Fluids OR Cycles 1

F02B - Internal-combustion Piston ENGINES; Combustion Engines IN General 1

Top 12 of 12 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Concepts ETI, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Concepts ETI, Inc.'s lead technology class is F01D (Non-positive Displacement Machines OR Engines, e.g. Steam Turbines), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F01D
Ranked #45,831 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Concepts ETI, Inc. against Composite Technologies, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.