Compact Membrane Systems, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01D (Separation).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Compact ranks #24,128 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #24,128
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 42%
- by Innovation Score (38.0/100)
- 18.6
- avg claims per patent
- +100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24128 · US Corporation #24,128 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 11 grants
- MID-PACK #24,128/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Code On Network Coding
- CPC-FOCUS B01D · 14 areas
- INNOV-THIN 38.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Code On Network Coding, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Compact’s 38.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Compact
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Compact Membrane… · this assignee
Compact Membrane… · this assignee
38 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Compact's Innovation Score is 38.0/100 (top 42% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Compact?
Each dot is one of Compact’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Compact’s own 18.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Compact's grants concentrate
Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 90.9% of grants classified under B01D (Separation). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Compact sits between Code On Network Coding, LLC and Conductix Wampfler France.
Compact's three-year grant acceleration
Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Compact's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Code On Network C…
Code On Network Coding, LLC
11 patents
- Columbus Mckinnon
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
11 patents
- Comfort Revolution
Comfort Revolution, LLC
11 patents
- Common Sensing
Common Sensing Inc.
11 patents
- of Motion
Company of Motion, LLC
11 patents
- Comrod AS
Comrod AS
11 patents
- Concept Group
Concept Group LLC
11 patents
- Conductix Wampfle…
Conductix Wampfler France
11 patents
- Compact Membrane… ◀
Compact Membrane Systems, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Compact holds 11 patents at rank #24,152, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Compact
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,152 in granted patent volume.
- Code On Network Coding, LLC #24,148 · 11 patents
- Columbus McKinnon Corporation #24,149 · 11 patents
- Comfort Revolution, LLC #24,150 · 11 patents
- Common Sensing Inc. #24,151 · 11 patents
- Company of Motion, LLC #24,153 · 11 patents
- Comrod AS #24,154 · 11 patents
- Concept Group LLC #24,155 · 11 patents
- Conductix Wampfler France #24,156 · 11 patents
Leaders in B01D (Separation)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Compact's primary technology class.
Compact's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 42% higher than 58% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2018 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2020 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2021 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2022 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2024 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 18.2% |
Which technologies does Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Compact Membrane Systems, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Compact Membrane Systems, Inc.'s lead technology class is B01D (Separation), 90.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01D
- Ranked #24,128 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. against Code On Network Coding, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 38.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.