Where does Climb Tech, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Climb Tech, LLC ranks #39,499 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Climb Tech, LLC hold?

Climb Tech, LLC holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2020, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is Climb Tech, LLC's Innovation Score?

Climb Tech, LLC has an Innovation Score of 25.1 out of 100 (16th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Climb Tech, LLC focus on?

Climb Tech, LLC's top technology area is A62B (Devices, Apparatus OR Methods FOR Life-saving) with 5 patents, ranking #46 of 266 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

Is Climb Tech, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Climb Tech, LLC's recent grant velocity is -80% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Climb Tech, LLC's patents?

Climb Tech, LLC's patents average 12.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Climb Tech, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Climb Tech, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A62B (Devices, Apparatus OR Methods FOR Life-saving).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Climb ranks #39,499 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 10 technology areas.

#39,499
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 16th percentile
by Innovation Score (25.1/100): 12.0
avg claims per patent: -80%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39499 · US Corporation #39,499 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #39,499/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Clerio Vision
CPC-FOCUS A62B · 10 areas
INNOV-THIN 25.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -80% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Clerio Vision, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Climb’s 25.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (27%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.2 pts (45%) Claim depth 7.2 pts (29%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Climb Tech · this assignee

25
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Climb's Innovation Score is 25.1/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Climb?

Each dot is one of Climb’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Climb’s own 12.0 claims/patent is at or below the 12.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Climb vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Climb's grants concentrate

Climb Tech, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under A62B (Devices, Apparatus OR Methods FOR Life-saving). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Climb sits between Clerio Vision, Inc. and Clinical Innovations, LLC.

Clerio Vision

6
Clic Goggles

6
Click Security

6
Climax Engineered…

6
Clinicloud

6
Clinicomp Interna…

6
Clinical Biotechn…

6
Clinical Innovati…

6
Climb Tech ◀

6

What this shows Climb holds 6 patents at rank #39,596, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Climb

By rank, the assignees closest to #39,596 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A62B (Devices)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Climb's primary technology class.

Climb's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Climb Tech, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	16.7%
2016	1	16.7%
2017	2	33.3%
2019	1	16.7%
2020	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Climb Tech, LLC patent most?

A62B - Devices, Apparatus OR Methods FOR Life-saving 5

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

F16F - SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration 1

E04G - SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; Building Implements OR Aids, OR Their USE; Handling Building Materials ON THE SITE; Repairing, Breaking-up OR Other Work ON Existing Buildings 1

E06C - Ladders 1

B23Q - Details, Components, OR Accessories FOR Machine Tools, e.g. Arrangements FOR Copying OR Controlling ; Machine Tools IN General Characterised BY THE Construction OF Particular Details OR COMPONENTS; Combinations OR Associations OF Metal-working Machines, NOT Directed TO A Particular Result 1

B23B - TURNING; Boring 1

B23C - Milling 1

B66C - CRANES; Load-engaging Elements OR Devices FOR Cranes, Capstans, Winches, OR Tackles 1

A01K - Animal HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; Rearing OR Breeding Animals, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; NEW Breeds OF Animals 1

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Climb Tech, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Climb Tech, LLC's lead technology class is A62B (Devices, Apparatus OR Methods FOR Life-saving), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A62B
Ranked #39,499 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Climb Tech, LLC against Clerio Vision, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 25.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.