USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Clam Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E04H (Buildings OR Like Structures FOR Particular PURPOSES; Swimming OR Splash Baths OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; Tents OR Canopies, IN General).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Clam ranks #20,934 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 12 technology areas.

#20,934
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
43rd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.9/100)
17.3
avg claims per patent
-70%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R20934 · US Corporation #20,934 · 13 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
  • MID-PACK #20,934/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH CI Systems (ISRAEL)
  • CPC-FOCUS E04H · 12 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 32.9/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 17.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -70% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: CI Systems (ISRAEL) Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Clam’s 32.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Clam

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Clam's Innovation Score is 32.9/100 (43rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Clam?

Each dot is one of Clam’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Clam’s own 17.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Clam vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 12.912.91313.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent CI Systems (ISRAEL) Ltd. - 13, 18CI Systems (Israe…Cibus Europe B.V. - 13, 14.46Cibus Europe B VCirocomm Technology Corp. - 13, 6.08Cirocomm Technolo…Civco Medical Instruments Co., Inc. - 13, 12.85Civco Medical Ins…Clarcor Inc. - 13, 21.92ClarcorClassys Inc. - 13, 4.15ClassysCloudcar, Inc. - 13, 18.38CloudcarCMI Defence S.A. - 13, 12.69CMI DefenceClam Corporation - 13, 17.31Clam
Clam vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Clam's grants concentrate

Clam Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 53.8% of grants classified under E04H (Buildings OR Like Structures FOR Particular PURPOSES; Swimming OR Splash Baths OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; Tents OR Canopies, IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Clam sits between CI Systems (ISRAEL) Ltd. and CMI Defence S.A..

Clam's three-year grant acceleration

Clam Corporation shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Clam's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Clam holds 13 patents at rank #20,909, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Clam

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,909 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in E04H (Buildings OR Like Structures FOR Particular Purposes)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Clam's primary technology class.

Clam's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 20172018201920202022 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Clam Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2017 5 38.5%
2018 1 7.7%
2019 4 30.8%
2020 2 15.4%
2022 1 7.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Clam Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Clam Corporation's lead technology class is E04H (Buildings OR Like Structures FOR Particular PURPOSES; Swimming OR Splash Baths OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; Tents OR Canopies, IN General), 53.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E04H
  • Ranked #20,934 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Clam Corporation against CI Systems (ISRAEL) Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 32.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.