Cirocomm Technology Corp.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Cirocomm ranks #20,930 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #20,930
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 10th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.1/100)
- 6.1
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R20930 · Foreign Corporation #20,930 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #20,930/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Chubu University…
- CPC-NARROW H01Q · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.1/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Chubu University Educational Foundation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Cirocomm’s 22.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cirocomm
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Cirocomm Technology · this assignee 22
Cirocomm Technology · this assignee
22 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Cirocomm's Innovation Score is 22.1/100 (10th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cirocomm?
Each dot is one of Cirocomm’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cirocomm’s own 6.1 claims/patent is at or below the 12.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Cirocomm's grants concentrate
Cirocomm Technology Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 46.2% of grants classified under H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Cirocomm sits between Chubu University Educational Foundation and Classys Inc..
Who files at Cirocomm's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Chubu University…
Chubu University Educational Foundation
13 patents
- Chugai RO
Chugai RO Co., Ltd.
13 patents
- CI Systems (Israe…
CI Systems (ISRAEL) Ltd.
13 patents
- Cibus Europe B V
Cibus Europe B.V.
13 patents
- Civco Medical Ins…
Civco Medical Instruments Co., Inc.
13 patents
- Clam
Clam Corporation
13 patents
- Clarcor
Clarcor Inc.
13 patents
- Classys
Classys Inc.
13 patents
- Cirocomm Technolo… ◀
Cirocomm Technology Corp.
13 patents
What this shows Cirocomm holds 13 patents at rank #20,907, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Cirocomm
By rank, the assignees closest to #20,907 in granted patent volume.
- Chubu University Educational Foundation #20,903 · 13 patents
- Chugai RO Co., Ltd. #20,904 · 13 patents
- CI Systems (ISRAEL) Ltd. #20,905 · 13 patents
- Cibus Europe B.V. #20,906 · 13 patents
- Civco Medical Instruments Co., Inc. #20,908 · 13 patents
- Clam Corporation #20,909 · 13 patents
- Clarcor Inc. #20,910 · 13 patents
- Classys Inc. #20,911 · 13 patents
Leaders in H01Q (Antennas)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cirocomm's primary technology class.
- Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 680 in class
- Apple Inc. 594 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 570 in class
- Commscope Technologies LLC 457 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 359 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 294 in class
- Raytheon Company 291 in class
- Wistron Neweb Corp. 260 in class
Cirocomm's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 10th percentile higher than 10% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2017 | 5 | 38.5% |
| 2018 | 4 | 30.8% |
| 2019 | 1 | 7.7% |
Which technologies does Cirocomm Technology Corp. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Cirocomm Technology Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Cirocomm Technology Corp.'s lead technology class is H01Q (Antennas, i.e. Radio Aerials), 46.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01Q
- Ranked #20,930 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Cirocomm Technology Corp. against Chubu University Educational Foundation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.