USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Cloudcar, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Cloudcar ranks #20,940 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 9 technology areas.

#20,940
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
35th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.8/100)
18.4
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R20940 · US Corporation #20,940 · 13 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
  • MID-PACK #20,940/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Civco Medical…
  • CPC-NARROW H04W · 9 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 30.8/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 18.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Civco Medical Instruments Co., Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Cloudcar’s 30.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Cloudcar

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Cloudcar's Innovation Score is 30.8/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Cloudcar?

Each dot is one of Cloudcar’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Cloudcar’s own 18.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Cloudcar vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 12.912.91313.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Civco Medical Instruments Co., Inc. - 13, 12.85Civco Medical Ins…Clam Corporation - 13, 17.31ClamClarcor Inc. - 13, 21.92ClarcorClassys Inc. - 13, 4.15ClassysCMI Defence S.A. - 13, 12.69CMI DefenceCoastal Source, LLC - 13, 6.08Coastal SourceComposites Intellectual Holdings, Inc. - 13, 17.62Composites Intell…Continental Powertrain USA, LLC - 13, 15.08Continental Power…Cloudcar, Inc. - 13, 18.38Cloudcar
Cloudcar vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Cloudcar's grants concentrate

Cloudcar, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 46.2% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Cloudcar sits between Civco Medical Instruments Co., Inc. and Continental Powertrain USA, LLC.

Who files at Cloudcar's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Cloudcar holds 13 patents at rank #20,912, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Cloudcar

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,912 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Cloudcar's primary technology class.

Cloudcar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 201520162017 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Cloudcar, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 6 46.2%
2016 6 46.2%
2017 1 7.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Cloudcar, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Cloudcar, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 46.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
  • Ranked #20,940 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Cloudcar, Inc. against Civco Medical Instruments Co., Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 30.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.