Overall rank by patents
#11,207
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 21 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02M (APPARATUS FOR CONVERSION BETWEEN AC AND AC, BETWEEN AC AND DC, OR BETWEEN DC AND DC, AND FOR USE WITH MAINS OR SIMILAR POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMS; CONVERSION OF DC OR AC INPUT POWER INTO SURGE OUTPUT POWER;).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Chaoyang ranks #11,207 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 21 technology areas.
Chaoyang Semiconductor Jiangyin Technology Co., Ltd. has been granted 27 US utility patents between 2018 and 2025, placing Chaoyang Semiconductor Jiangyin Technology Co., Ltd. at #11,207 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 21 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in H02M (APPARATUS FOR CONVERSION BETWEEN AC AND AC, BETWEEN AC AND DC, OR BETWEEN DC AND DC, AND FOR USE WITH MAINS OR SIMILAR POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMS; CONVERSION OF DC OR AC INPUT POWER INTO SURGE OUTPUT POWER;). As a US Corporation, Chaoyang Semiconductor Jiangyin Technology Co., Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Chaoyang sits between CDE Global Limited (27 patents, rank #11,199) and Coperion Gmbh (27 patents, rank #11,207) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 35.5/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 15 grants, compared with 11 in the 2015–2019 window, a +36% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Chaoyang Semiconductor Jiangyin Technology Co., Ltd.'s 11.8 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 21 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
CDE Global Limited
27 patents
CEMBRE S.P.A.
27 patents
CENTRAL MOTOR WHEEL CO., LTD.
27 patents
CHAMP VISION DISPLAY INC.
27 patents
CLEARSIDE BIOMEDICAL, INC.
27 patents
CO2PAC Limited
27 patents
COGNYTE TECHNOLOGIES ISRAEL LTD.
27 patents
COPERION GMBH
27 patents
CHAOYANG SEMICONDUCTOR JIANGYIN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
27 patents
What this shows Chaoyang holds 27 patents at rank #11,203, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #11,203 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Chaoyang's primary technology class.
Chaoyang's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 Top 49% higher than 51% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 4 | 14.8% |
| 2019 | 7 | 25.9% |
| 2020 | 8 | 29.6% |
| 2021 | 5 | 18.5% |
| 2022 | 2 | 7.4% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 3.7% |
Top 15 of 21 technology areas
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#11,207
of 50,000 tracked assignees
35.5 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Chaoyang's 27 grants land it in the top 49% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.