Where does ChampionX USA Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), ChampionX USA Inc. ranks #5,921 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does ChampionX USA Inc. hold?

ChampionX USA Inc. holds 57 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2024, spanning 30 technology areas.

What is ChampionX USA Inc.'s Innovation Score?

ChampionX USA Inc. has an Innovation Score of 48.5 out of 100 (top 16% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does ChampionX USA Inc. focus on?

ChampionX USA Inc.'s top technology area is C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere) with 48 patents, ranking #65 of 1,605 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 30 CPC subclasses total.

Is ChampionX USA Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for ChampionX USA Inc..

What does claim depth mean for ChampionX USA Inc.'s patents?

ChampionX USA Inc.'s patents average 15.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the ChampionX USA Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

ChampionX USA Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 57 granted patents across 30 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Championx ranks #5,921 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 57 patents across 30 technology areas.

#5,921
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 16%
by Innovation Score (48.5/100): 15.8
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5921 · US Corporation #5,921 · 57 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 57 grants
UPPER-Q #5,921/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Carbon Technology…
CPC-FOCUS C09K · 30 areas
INNOV-PAR 48.5/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Carbon Technology Holdings, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Championx’s 48.5 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.0 pts (29%) Velocity 5.6 pts (12%) Breadth 19.4 pts (40%) Claim depth 9.5 pts (20%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Baltimore Aircoil · near

48
ChampionX USA · this assignee

48
Sungwoo Hitech · near

48
Treace Medical… · near

48
Bunn-O-Matic · near

48
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Championx's Innovation Score is 48.5/100 (top 16% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Championx?

Each dot is one of Championx’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Championx’s own 15.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Championx vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Championx's grants concentrate

ChampionX USA Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 30 CPC subclasses with 84.2% of grants classified under C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (24 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2024. By volume, Championx sits between Curver Luxembourg Sarl and D B Industries, LLC.

Championx's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, ChampionX USA Inc. moved from 31 to 26 grants (0.84x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Curver Luxembourg…

57
Carbon Technology…

57
Cardio Flow

57
Ceva Sante Animale

57
Clearfield

57
Computational Sys…

57
Cornelius

57
D B Industries

57
Championx USA ◀

57

What this shows ChampionX holds 57 patents at rank #5,923, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near ChampionX

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,923 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in ChampionX's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for ChampionX, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications), ChampionX ranks #65 of 1,605 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (48 here).

Sungwoo Hitech Co., Ltd. 48 Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. 48 Bunn-O-Matic Corporation 48 Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc. 48

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (15.8 here).

Forschungsverbund Berlin e.V. 15.8 avg Arcam AB 15.8 avg Samsung SDS Co., Ltd. 15.8 avg Transportation IP Holdings, LLC 15.8 avg

Championx's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 16% higher than 84% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

ChampionX USA Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	7	12.3%
2021	24	42.1%
2022	15	26.3%
2023	8	14.0%
2024	3	5.3%

Which technologies does ChampionX USA Inc. patent most?

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 48

E21B - Earth OR Rock DRILLING; Obtaining OIL, GAS, Water, Soluble OR Meltable Materials OR A Slurry OF Minerals From Wells 17

C23F - Non-mechanical Removal OF Metallic Material From Surface ; Inhibiting Corrosion OF Metallic Material OR Incrustation IN GENERAL; Multi-step Processes FOR Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material Involving AT Least ONE Process Provided FOR IN Class C23 AND AT Least ONE Process Covered BY Subclass C21d 15

C10L - Fuels NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Natural GAS; Synthetic Natural GAS Obtained BY Processes NOT Covered BY Subclasses C10g OR C10K; Liquified Petroleum GAS; USE OF Additives TO Fuels OR FIRES; Fire-lighters 9

C07C - Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds 9

C10G - Cracking Hydrocarbon OILS; Production OF Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixtures, e.g. BY Destructive Hydrogenation, Oligomerisation, Polymerisation ; Recovery OF Hydrocarbon Oils From Oil-shale, Oil-sand, OR GASES; Refining Mixtures Mainly Consisting OF HYDROCARBONS; Reforming OF NAPHTHA; Mineral Waxes 7

C02F - Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge 6

C07D - Heterocyclic Compounds 5

C08F - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained BY Reactions Only Involving Carbon-to-carbon Unsaturated Bonds 4

B01D - Separation 4

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 4

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 4

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 3

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 3

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 2

Top 15 of 30 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

ChampionX USA Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

ChampionX USA Inc.'s lead technology class is C09K (Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere), 84.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C09K
Ranked #5,921 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare ChampionX USA Inc. against Curver Luxembourg Sarl, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 48.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.